linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
	Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] PM: domains: Drop/restore performance state votes for devices at runtime PM
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:25:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210603095538.b2t3cq25tq7v7kih@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210603093438.138705-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

On 03-06-21, 11:34, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> A subsystem/driver that need to manage OPPs for its device, should
> typically drop its vote for the OPP when the device becomes runtime
> suspended. In this way, the corresponding aggregation of the performance
> state votes that is managed in genpd for the attached PM domain, may find
> that the aggregated vote can be decreased. Hence, it may allow genpd to set
> the lower performance state for the PM domain, thus avoiding to waste
> energy.
> 
> To accomplish this, typically a subsystem/driver would need to call
> dev_pm_opp_set_rate|opp() for its device from its ->runtime_suspend()
> callback, to drop the vote for the OPP. Accordingly, it needs another call
> to dev_pm_opp_set_rate|opp() to restore the vote for the OPP from its
> ->runtime_resume() callback.
> 
> To avoid boilerplate code in subsystems/driver to deal with these things,
> let's instead manage this internally in genpd.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Rebased.
> 	- A few minor cosmetic changes.
> 	- Deal with the error path in genpd_runtime_resume().
> 
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/pm_domain.h   |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index ef25a5b18587..e5d97174c254 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -400,6 +400,23 @@ static int genpd_set_performance_state(struct device *dev, unsigned int state)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int genpd_drop_performance_state(struct device *dev)

What about passing the state pointer here? that will simplify the
callers to just a call.

> +{
> +	unsigned int prev_state = dev_gpd_data(dev)->performance_state;
> +
> +	if (!genpd_set_performance_state(dev, 0))
> +		return prev_state;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void genpd_restore_performance_state(struct device *dev,
> +					    unsigned int state)
> +{
> +	if (state)

I will skip this check, as we are checking it in
genpd_set_performance_state() anyway ?

> +		genpd_set_performance_state(dev, state);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state- Set performance state of device's power
>   * domain.
> @@ -842,7 +859,8 @@ static int genpd_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
>  	bool (*suspend_ok)(struct device *__dev);
> -	struct gpd_timing_data *td = &dev_gpd_data(dev)->td;
> +	struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data = dev_gpd_data(dev);
> +	struct gpd_timing_data *td = &gpd_data->td;
>  	bool runtime_pm = pm_runtime_enabled(dev);
>  	ktime_t time_start;
>  	s64 elapsed_ns;
> @@ -899,6 +917,7 @@ static int genpd_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	genpd_lock(genpd);
> +	gpd_data->rpm_pstate = genpd_drop_performance_state(dev);

So this will become:

	genpd_drop_performance_state(dev, &gpd_data->rpm_pstate);

and it can have return type of void.

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-03  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-03  9:34 [PATCH v2 0/4] PM: domains: Avoid boilerplate code for DVFS in subsystem/drivers Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PM: domains: Split code in dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state() Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PM: domains: Return early if perf state is already set for the device Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] PM: domains: Drop/restore performance state votes for devices at runtime PM Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03  9:55   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2021-06-03 10:31     ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03 11:17       ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-04  3:53         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-04  7:45           ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-07  4:47             ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-09 12:25               ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03 19:02   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-06-03 19:08     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-06-04  7:20       ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] PM: domains: Drop/restore performance state votes for devices at system PM Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03 10:20   ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03 11:15     ` Mark Brown
2021-06-03 13:48       ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-08 12:53     ` Stephan Gerhold
2021-06-08 14:08       ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-08 14:20         ` Mark Brown
2021-06-08 14:39           ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-08 15:37         ` Stephan Gerhold
2021-06-03 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] PM: domains: Avoid boilerplate code for DVFS in subsystem/drivers Stephan Gerhold
2021-06-03 15:27   ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-03 17:14     ` Stephan Gerhold
2021-06-04  7:18       ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-04  8:23         ` Stephan Gerhold
2021-06-04 10:57           ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-04 11:50             ` Stephan Gerhold
2021-06-11 16:42               ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210603095538.b2t3cq25tq7v7kih@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rojay@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).