linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 15:42:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220613134213.8904-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220613134213.8904-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>

With the passive governor, the cpu based scaling can PROBE_DEFER due to
the fact that CPU policy are not ready.
The cpufreq passive unregister notifier is called both from the
GOV_START errors and for the GOV_STOP and assume the notifier is
successfully registred every time. With GOV_START failing it's wrong to
loop over each possible CPU since the register path has failed for
some CPU policy not ready. Change the logic and unregister the notifer
based on the current allocated parent_cpu_data list to correctly handle
errors and the governor unregister path.

Fixes: a03dacb0316f ("PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor")
Signed-off-by: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 21 +++++----------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
index 72c67979ebe1..6252f109f8d1 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
 	struct devfreq_passive_data *p_data
 			= (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data;
 	struct devfreq_cpu_data *parent_cpu_data;
-	int cpu, ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (p_data->nb.notifier_call) {
 		ret = cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&p_data->nb,
@@ -232,27 +232,16 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
-		if (!policy) {
-			ret = -EINVAL;
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		parent_cpu_data = get_parent_cpu_data(p_data, policy);
-		if (!parent_cpu_data) {
-			cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-			continue;
-		}
-
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(parent_cpu_data, &p_data->cpu_data_list, node) {
 		list_del(&parent_cpu_data->node);
+
 		if (parent_cpu_data->opp_table)
 			dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(parent_cpu_data->opp_table);
+
 		kfree(parent_cpu_data);
-		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 	}
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int cpufreq_passive_register_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
-- 
2.36.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-13 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-13 13:42 [PATCH v2 0/5] PM / devfreq: Various Fixes to cpufreq based passive governor Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
2022-06-13 13:42 ` Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi [this message]
2022-06-14  6:59   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER kernel test robot
2022-06-14  9:01   ` kernel test robot
2022-06-13 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel warning with cpufreq passive register fail Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
2022-06-13 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel panic with cpu based scaling to passive gov Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
2022-06-13 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PM / devfreq: Rework freq_table to be local to devfreq struct Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
2022-06-13 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PM / devfreq: Mute warning on governor PROBE_DEFER Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220613134213.8904-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --to=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).