From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] cpufreq: Remove the redundant !setpolicy check
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:52:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2485108.CxIRPt9KNH@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9bac95bcc36f5f70e910e4801be5d4f8fd32d0c.1560999838.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 5:05:46 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> cpufreq_start_governor() is only called for !setpolicy case, checking it
> again is not required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 85ff958e01f1..54befd775bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@ static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu);
>
> - if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy)
> + if (cpufreq_driver->get)
> cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy);
>
> if (policy->governor->start) {
>
Applied, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-20 3:05 [PATCH V2 0/5] cpufreq: cleanups Viresh Kumar
2019-06-20 3:05 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] cpufreq: Remove the redundant !setpolicy check Viresh Kumar
2019-06-27 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-06-20 3:05 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] cpufreq: Replace few CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS checks with has_target() Viresh Kumar
2019-06-27 5:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-27 9:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-28 5:16 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] cpufreq: Don't skip frequency validation for has_target() drivers Viresh Kumar
2019-06-20 3:05 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] cpufreq: Use has_target() instead of !setpolicy Viresh Kumar
2019-06-27 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-20 3:05 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: Reuse cpufreq_update_current_freq() in __cpufreq_get() Viresh Kumar
2019-06-20 3:05 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] cpufreq: Avoid calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() from handle_update() Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2485108.CxIRPt9KNH@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).