Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Drop the SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() macro

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>]

On Wednesday, December 03, 2014 03:15:49 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 27 November 2014 at 01:38, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > The SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() and SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() macros are
> > identical except that one of them is not empty for CONFIG_PM set,
> > while the other one is not empty for CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME set,
> > respectively.
> >
> > However, after commit b2b49ccbdd54 (PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if
> > PM_SLEEP is selected) PM_RUNTIME is always set if PM is set, so one
> > of these macros is now redundant.
> >
> > For this reason, drop SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() and replace it with
> > SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() everywhere.
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> Apparently, I have queued an mmc patch in my mmc tree, which means one
> mmc driver starts using the SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS macro. It should
> cause a build error in linux-next with @subject patch.
> 
> I have shared that patch through an immutable branch, I have also
> checked potential conflicts and it shouldn't be any problems to pull
> that in to your tree. Then you can fix $subject patch by also
> converting the mmc driver to use SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS macro.
> 
> The branch is available at:
> git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc.git mmc_for_linux_pm

Thanks for letting me know!

What about adding the following line to the $subject patch instead:

#define SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS

and fixing things up when all has been merged?


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.