linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Return genpd virtual devices from dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 15:09:57 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ed7993d-523b-270a-2be9-83ad2426e946@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <027985ce35873cd218298302a1408da06d48458b.1562565567.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>


On 7/8/2019 11:30 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The cpufreq drivers don't need to do runtime PM operations on the
> virtual devices returned by dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() and so the
> virtual devices weren't shared with the callers of
> dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() earlier.
> 
> But the IO device drivers would want to do that. This patch updates the
> prototype of dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() to accept another argument to
> return the pointer to the array of genpd virtual devices.
> 
> Reported-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> @Rajendra: Can you please test this one ? I have only compile tested it.

Sorry for the delay, I seem to have completely missed this patch.
I just gave this a try and here are some observations,

I have a case where I have one device with 2 power domains, one of them
is scale-able (supports perf state) and the other one supports only being
turned on and off.

1. In the driver I now need to use dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name/id to attach the
power domain which supports only on/off and then use dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()
for the one which supports perf states.

2. My OPP table has only 1 required_opps, so the required_opp_count for the OPP table is 1.
Now if my device tree has my scale-able powerdomain at index 1 (it works if its at index 0)
then I end up with this error

[    2.858628] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: Index can't be greater than required-opp-count - 1, rpmh_pd (1 : 1)

so it looks like a lot of the OPP core today just assumes that if a device has multiple power domains,
all of them are scale-able which isn't necessarily true.

> 
>   drivers/opp/core.c     | 5 ++++-
>   include/linux/pm_opp.h | 4 ++--
>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> index 2958cc7bbb58..07b6f1187b3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> @@ -1775,6 +1775,7 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
>    * dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd - Attach genpd(s) for the device and save virtual device pointer
>    * @dev: Consumer device for which the genpd is getting attached.
>    * @names: Null terminated array of pointers containing names of genpd to attach.
> + * @virt_devs: Pointer to return the array of virtual devices.
>    *
>    * Multiple generic power domains for a device are supported with the help of
>    * virtual genpd devices, which are created for each consumer device - genpd
> @@ -1789,7 +1790,8 @@ static void _opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
>    * This helper needs to be called once with a list of all genpd to attach.
>    * Otherwise the original device structure will be used instead by the OPP core.
>    */
> -struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names)
> +struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev,
> +		const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
>   {
>   	struct opp_table *opp_table;
>   	struct device *virt_dev;
> @@ -1850,6 +1852,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names
>   		name++;
>   	}
>   
> +	*virt_devs = opp_table->genpd_virt_devs;
>   	mutex_unlock(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock);
>   
>   	return opp_table;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> index be570761b77a..7c2fe2952f40 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(struct device *dev, const char * name);
>   void dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(struct opp_table *opp_table);
>   struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_register_set_opp_helper(struct device *dev, int (*set_opp)(struct dev_pm_set_opp_data *data));
>   void dev_pm_opp_unregister_set_opp_helper(struct opp_table *opp_table);
> -struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names);
> +struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs);
>   void dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table);
>   int dev_pm_opp_xlate_performance_state(struct opp_table *src_table, struct opp_table *dst_table, unsigned int pstate);
>   int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq);
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_set_clkname(struct device *dev, const
>   
>   static inline void dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(struct opp_table *opp_table) {}
>   
> -static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names)
> +static inline struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd(struct device *dev, const char **names, struct device ***virt_devs)
>   {
>   	return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
>   }
> 

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-11  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08  6:00 [PATCH] opp: Return genpd virtual devices from dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() Viresh Kumar
2019-07-11  9:39 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2019-07-17  5:47   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-17 10:04     ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-07-17 10:14       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-16 10:43 ` Niklas Cassel
2019-07-17  2:52   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ed7993d-523b-270a-2be9-83ad2426e946@codeaurora.org \
    --to=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).