From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] cpuidle: teo: Avoid stopping scheduler tick too often
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 20:49:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4515817.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher> (raw)
Hi Folks,
Patch [1/3] in this series is a v3 of this patch posted last week:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/4506480.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher/
Patch [2/3] (this is the second version of it) addresses some bail out paths
in teo_select() in which the scheduler tick may be stopped unnecessarily too.
Patch [3/3] replaces a structure field with a local variable (while at it)
and it is the same as its previous version.
According to this message:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAJZ5v0jJxHj65r2HXBTd3wfbZtsg=_StzwO1kA5STDnaPe_dWA@mail.gmail.com/
this series significantly reduces the number of cases in which the governor
requests stopping the tick when the selected idle state is shallow, which is
incorrect.
Thanks!
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-31 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-31 18:49 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2023-07-31 18:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] cpuidle: teo: Update idle duration estimate when choosing shallower state Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-07-31 19:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cpuidle: teo: Avoid stopping the tick unnecessarily when bailing out Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-07-31 19:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cpuidle: teo: Drop utilized from struct teo_cpu Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-01 21:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] cpuidle: teo: Avoid stopping scheduler tick too often Kajetan Puchalski
2023-08-02 12:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4515817.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kajetan.puchalski@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).