linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com, kenny@panix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap: adjust init order
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:33:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4518853.ESMkGYUoe6@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1563677384-20163-1-git-send-email-rui.zhang@intel.com>

On Sunday, July 21, 2019 4:49:44 AM CEST Zhang Rui wrote:
> The MMIO RAPL interface driver depends on both powercap subsystem and
> the intel_rapl_common code.
> But when all of them are built in, the MMIO RAPL interface driver is
> loaded before the later two and this breaks the system during boot.
> This is because the powercap sysfs class is not registered and the
> rapl_defaults ops is not set when built-in MMIO RAPL interface driver
> gets loaded.
> 
> Fix this by adjusting the init order of powercap subsystem and the
> intel_rapl_common code, so that their init functions are executed before
> MMIO RAPL interface driver in any case.
> 
> Fixes: 555c45fe0d04 ("int340X/processor_thermal_device: add support for MMIO RAPL")
> Reported-and-tested-by: Kenneth R. Crudup <kenny@panix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c      | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> index 9fd6dd3..6df4818 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> @@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ static void __exit rapl_exit(void)
>  	unregister_pm_notifier(&rapl_pm_notifier);
>  }
>  
> -module_init(rapl_init);
> +fs_initcall(rapl_init);
>  module_exit(rapl_exit);
>  
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Runtime Average Power Limit (RAPL) common code");
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c b/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
> index 540e8aa..f808c5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c
> @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static int __init powercap_init(void)
>  	return class_register(&powercap_class);
>  }
>  
> -device_initcall(powercap_init);
> +fs_initcall(powercap_init);
>  
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PowerCap sysfs Driver");
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>");
> 

Applied (with some subject and changelog tweaks), thanks!





      reply	other threads:[~2019-07-22  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-21  2:49 [PATCH] powercap: adjust init order Zhang Rui
2019-07-22  9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4518853.ESMkGYUoe6@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=kenny@panix.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).