Linux-PM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@android.com>
Cc: Tri Vo <trong@android.com>,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@google.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Alternatives to /sys/kernel/debug/wakeup_sources
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:23:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4587569.x9DSL43cXO@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190618182502.GC203031@google.com>

On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 10:17:16 PM CEST Sandeep Patil wrote:
> 
> Hi Rafael, Viresh etc.
> 
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:31:16AM -0700, Tri Vo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:23 PM Tri Vo <trong@android.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Rafael,
> > >
> > > Currently, Android reads wakeup sources statistics from
> > > /sys/kernel/debug/wakeup_sources in production environment. This
> > > information is used, for example, to report which wake lock prevents
> > > the device from suspending.
> 
> Android's usage of the 'wakeup_sources' from debugfs can is linked at[1].
> Basically, android's battery stats implementation to plot history for suspend
> blocking wakeup sources over device's boot cycle. This is used both for power
> specific bug reporting but also is one of the stats that will be used towards
> attributing the battery consumption to specific processes over the period of
> time.
> 
> Android depended on the out-of-tree /proc/wakelocks before and now relies on
> wakeup_sources debugfs entry heavily for the aforementioned use cases.
> 
> > >
> > > Android userspace reading wakeup_sources is not ideal because:
> > > - Debugfs API is not stable, i.e. Android tools built on top of it are
> > > not guaranteed to be backward/forward compatible.
> > > - This file requires debugfs to be mounted, which itself is
> > > undesirable for security reasons.
> > >
> > > To address these problems, we want to contribute a way to expose these
> > > statistics that doesn't depend on debugfs.
> > >
> > > Some initial thoughts/questions: Should we expose the stats in sysfs?
> > > Or maybe implement eBPF-based solution? What do you think?
> 
> We are going through Android's out-of-tree kernel dependencies along with
> userspace APIs that are not necessarily considered "stable and forever
> supported" upstream. The debugfs dependencies showed up on our radar as a
> result and so we are wondering if we should worry about changes in debugfs
> interface and hence the question(s) below.
> 
> So, can we rely on /d/wakeup_sources to be considered a userspace API and
> hence maintained stable as we do for other /proc and /sys entries?
> 
> If yes, then we will go ahead and add tests for this in LTP or
> somewhere else suitable.

No, debugfs is not ABI.

> If no, then we would love to hear suggestions for any changes that need to be
> made or we simply just move the debugfs entry into somewhere like
> /sys/power/ ?

No, moving that entire file from debugfs into sysfs is not an option either.

The statistics for the wakeup sources associated with devices are already there
under /sys/devices/.../power/ , but I guess you want all wakeup sources?

That would require adding a kobject to struct wakeup_source and exposing
all of the statistics as separate attributes under it.  In which case it would be
good to replace the existing wakeup statistics under /sys/devices/.../power/
with symbolic links to the attributes under the wakeup_source kobject.

> As a side effect, if the entry moves out of debugfs, Android can run without
> mounting debugfs in production that I assume is a good thing.

And really Android developers might have thought about this a bit earlier.

Thanks!




  reply index

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-05  0:23 Tri Vo
2019-06-11 17:31 ` Tri Vo
2019-06-18 20:17   ` Sandeep Patil
2019-06-18 21:23     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-06-18 23:15       ` Tri Vo
2019-06-18 23:52         ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-19  8:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-19 10:33             ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-19 16:51             ` Sandeep Patil
2019-06-19 16:53             ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-19 17:07               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-19 18:01                 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-19 18:31                   ` Tri Vo
2019-06-19 18:35                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-19 18:55                     ` Joel Fernandes
     [not found]                       ` <CAGETcx-ZZRc_jtBws2cFTe1wjiWeBowdqfqOhcCJV_7AUyBEVw@mail.gmail.com>
2019-06-19 20:09                         ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-19 20:40                           ` Saravana Kannan
2019-06-19 20:52                             ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-24  1:48             ` Tri Vo
2019-06-24  7:36               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-24 12:27                 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-24 21:55                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-24 22:14                     ` Tri Vo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4587569.x9DSL43cXO@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hridya@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sspatil@android.com \
    --cc=trong@android.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-PM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/0 linux-pm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pm linux-pm/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm \
		linux-pm@vger.kernel.org linux-pm@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-pm


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox