Linux-PM Archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <>
To: David Dai <>,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Update Qualcomm SDM845 DT bindings
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:27:40 -0700
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Quoting David Dai (2019-07-24 10:22:57)
> The way that I view this is that the consumers consume both bandwidth 
> and QoS from these physical NoC devices by getting some path between two 
> endpoints on these different NoCs and applying some constraints. The NoC 
> providers can accomplish that either by writing to MMIO spaces or by 
> talking to some remote processor/hardware to tune its clock speed. The 
> consumer doesn't interact with the RSCs directly, but can select a 
> different bcm voter based on the endpoints that are associated with a 
> particular bcm(apps or disp rsc). Each node(endpoints) will have its own 
> BCM designation and an unique bcm voter.

Ok. I get it now. The MMIO nodes will be interconnect providers and
they'll know what RSCs they can use by exposing the same RSC "resource"
multiple times for each RSC that can be targeted? This is what the
postfix is with _DISP on your examples? Presumably there's an _APPS
version of the same prefixed endpoint in case the consumer wants to use
the APPS RSC instead of the DISP one, or maybe there's just no postfix
in this case because APPS is the "default".

  reply index

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-19 20:32 [PATCH 0/2] Redefine interconnect provider DT nodes for SDM845 David Dai
2019-07-19 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Update Qualcomm SDM845 DT bindings David Dai
2019-07-21 19:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-07-23 14:42   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-23 21:48     ` David Dai
2019-07-24 14:18       ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-24 17:22         ` David Dai
2019-07-24 18:27           ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-07-24 20:42             ` David Dai
2019-07-19 20:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: sdm845: Redefine interconnect provider DT nodes David Dai
2019-07-21 19:13   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-07-23 18:24     ` David Dai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-PM Archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror linux-pm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pm linux-pm/ \
	public-inbox-index linux-pm

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox