From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Guilhem Lettron <guilhem@barpilot.io>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: Add ICL support
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:19:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72fab2376722c6169549669016933217d3da34a0.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGX5Wg0=K5AaTut5KH3R3+oasM5MM7PaJ9Z_L56xSNckMbWC9g@mail.gmail.com>
Indeed, when I compare them:
acpi_idle (without the patch):
CPU%c1 CPU%c6 CPU%c7 CoreTmp PkgTmp GFX%rc6 Pkg%pc2 Pkg%pc3 Pkg%pc6 Pkg%pc7 Pkg%pc8 Pkg%pc9 Pk%pc10 PkgWatt
29.48 0.00 60.71 58 58 97.96 16.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.08
intel_idle (with the patch):
CPU%c1 CPU%c6 CPU%c7 CoreTmp PkgTmp GFX%rc6 Pkg%pc2 Pkg%pc3 Pkg%pc6 Pkg%pc7 Pkg%pc8 Pkg%pc9 Pk%pc10 PkgWatt
56 56 96.64 300 68.29 48.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.38 0.00
With intel_idle we reach PC10, without it we only go as deep as PC2 - huge difference.
I really wonder why the BIOS does not expose deeper C-states... And if
it does not, is this for a reason? And how windows works then?
May be there is a BIOS update that fixes this problem? May be Windows
user get it quickly because stuff like this is often well-integrated in
Windows? Would you please check if there is newer BIOS?
Artem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-26 12:04 [PATCH] intel_idle: Add ICL support Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 12:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 13:03 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 13:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 13:19 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 13:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 13:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 13:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 13:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 13:32 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 13:41 ` Zhang Rui
2020-08-26 14:04 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 16:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 16:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 16:39 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 16:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 16:46 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 17:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 17:47 ` Zhang Rui
2020-08-26 16:52 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 16:19 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2020-08-26 16:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 16:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 16:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <CAGX5Wg0655U71nFcaAJXmj1XMA3MjnCVn=q1Pf=7LLyryHhroQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-08-26 13:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 13:34 ` Guilhem Lettron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72fab2376722c6169549669016933217d3da34a0.camel@gmail.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=guilhem@barpilot.io \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).