From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717D9C433E2 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511F321556 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="s8V6n0xA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729234AbgHaPiV (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:38:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56456 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728885AbgHaPhz (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:37:55 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com (mail-io1-xd43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69A48C061573; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id g13so6372009ioo.9; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:37:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eKhPg2peu0bzgNag4eCqNzrqsBROFucfPoSefuXeaw4=; b=s8V6n0xALCLBzggML/oL2yBo0b4sDJ8Fn3DqT0kDfs/UOSNjzu72iqpAcc/jOJMKfr A/X2ov0QZLPmxbLfzmr20VzbN4QpLVcB8/ifn3Hnv709YWR2nhhjTxPG24HCRl5kcDT/ vk5JoQYRHzNAmuWsYm7HmliEhq5ubgdI3t/2C8Ogm/yL+V7S3MJLBZ323Oq5Vt2/D3DB OKh8Y2eauBBIl0MR/puj5LHTeekB602eHpsIHDKNxTijC2Ktrupnf9uOB+L0aFc+bCT8 3JIMkJ1d0l9l6M/R9X1Keodws4gRxelxxxJlBKkosrBYvuZneLQIHkRn4f6Sx1K7ePq5 lAzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eKhPg2peu0bzgNag4eCqNzrqsBROFucfPoSefuXeaw4=; b=n1hODbegBkoUw54XoTSBBzD8QeRjRpSzlSTgUW38Mf6oZqjwMEJ74kw1fIxS7vsUmx vP8XWMBisTR6kulnH6kj7xaQUEep2NHs3OI8PM008MxWbPpmuaXt44LfafJ8ycHQhWCW JMUOR1yWkJ29ewRsiEHNJbY16UnsRBuOHefZXMW1MGnfsJQo4U+zcGGTeKnNJwrCQDI+ ajKoqwkV+mplbVqKxFZkhveLjcneOwhVaiSqMO7JWvfilR4XH/D3xa2G7usQmlKtRagx LqXkEsfivxDP4L6/UcJovCMZQgmtLumXt5kKaVmWomixFhDV/Z1YfG1d39XYwF1Q/HGV 747A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kkzl5xMwZTiz4q7MrG5DST0qLn5gcdRhvMGz/FcFeLAxMBmvy ziI5isq7HNOOO9E5nn9vqApOOTkD08i+BzmH3vM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNBcqnCmmfCXu/qtgS8DcU6uT+FMOssh+c39rLoFbOIo6hVA6Vu3hW/p2ti6dlo5FyhXDcPgG1rpZIIDrEP2o= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:80c6:: with SMTP id h6mr1735767ior.2.1598888272759; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Syed Nayyar Waris Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 21:07:41 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro To: Linus Walleij Cc: Andy Shevchenko , William Breathitt Gray , Michal Simek , Arnd Bergmann , Robert Richter , Bartosz Golaszewski , Masahiro Yamada , Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Linux-Arch , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux ARM , Linux PM list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 6:19 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > Hi Syed, > > sorry for taking so long. I was on vacation and a bit snowed > under by work. > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:10 AM Syed Nayyar Waris wrote: > > > Since this patchset primarily affects GPIO drivers, would you like > > to pick it up through your GPIO tree? > > I have applied the patches to an immutable branch and pushed > to kernelorg for testing (autobuilders will play with it I hope). > > If all works fine I will merge this into my devel branch for v5.9. > > It would be desirable if Andrew gave his explicit ACK on it too. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Hi Linus, As a reminder, I would like to point out about the 'for_each_set_clump' patchset. If it's alright and if anything is needed to take it further so that it is finally accepted. Regards Syed Nayyar Waris