From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] pinctrl: Remove use of driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue()
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:21:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYVQs0dDT8dn2GzQQXrbXATRi8iqHB41EQBMEwMiEFgzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220050440.45878-4-john.stultz@linaro.org>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:05 AM John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> With the earlier sanity fixes to
> driver_deferred_probe_check_state() it should be usable for the
> pinctrl logic here.
>
> So tweak the logic to use driver_deferred_probe_check_state()
> instead of driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue()
>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Change-Id: If72682e0a7641b33edf56f188fc067c68bbc571e
I sure trust that you know what you're doing here.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
I assume you will merge this through device core?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-21 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 5:04 [PATCH v4 0/6] driver core: Try to improve and cleanup driver_deferred_probe_check_state() John Stultz
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] driver core: Fix driver_deferred_probe_check_state() logic John Stultz
2020-02-20 10:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-20 15:55 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-20 23:40 ` Pavel Machek
2020-02-20 23:42 ` John Stultz
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] driver core: Set deferred_probe_timeout to a longer default if CONFIG_MODULES is set John Stultz
2020-02-20 10:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-20 15:55 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] pinctrl: Remove use of driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue() John Stultz
2020-02-21 15:21 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2020-02-21 17:19 ` John Stultz
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] driver core: Remove driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue() John Stultz
2020-02-20 10:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-20 15:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] driver core: Rename deferred_probe_timeout and make it global John Stultz
2020-02-20 10:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-20 16:00 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] regulator: Use driver_deferred_probe_timeout for regulator_init_complete_work John Stultz
2020-02-20 16:05 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-20 10:15 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] driver core: Try to improve and cleanup driver_deferred_probe_check_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdYVQs0dDT8dn2GzQQXrbXATRi8iqHB41EQBMEwMiEFgzA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).