From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC96CC072B5 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 16:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28CB20851 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 16:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gyMNUSgf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390354AbfEXQ36 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 12:29:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:37255 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390021AbfEXQ35 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 12:29:57 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id a23so5638308pff.4; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:29:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KsSYQVXsBY1mlm2cIOkHAHijOgSPMJrx2a8OVNsTPRk=; b=gyMNUSgfpkJ9locCgYPUYUhmSYez9pzqDg0TulwtrT5Nfiez5O14X8vV4I5UpVHha4 6aF+2uocz9uA/BYUdKwM77wJ+Jvam7gFkRA2vVy7Av0Gkudq7ES2aJjzEkfqAUPEUQpo 8xc3N/nYSyAlJTTPVMEAl7gdTy+JxuOF54L3MtvdKlS4p9rHo4uxBkbhOpOjB9Zcy8vz ocQIyVzpvNBnTsbLsByPCZNR8rmYfDwbDZ6xkLaHEXMC2mT/nhGV8XQOH+DSnw0Ft6Rs Ju3ojKdCKOHXT3yuAM2J71p3yo1lTdR7EMYV0fsfKPTnS3Hm87nxVir+eDBEGQ7qRgZE cVnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KsSYQVXsBY1mlm2cIOkHAHijOgSPMJrx2a8OVNsTPRk=; b=qo/S0o1u5hGvnMc18bLGX/sVhHKv5IQ9DAJCVZxz4FnMAxF4fpceITZ5neKIhdHeQV xE/cbr64V2mURYcWaHN7sPak1GhyT17/n6uxDlg6wIJSp3z9/nQHFf0WEckMnfYf2e5b lZAHVWf0aaCK/QguEIhovmxGRse+v50pGRY1Z+3JpU66H2akrCIdecIx1Hb502Z6QHlH FrOO0I3bzb7G9LNY9QkJcS3fpJ8TfP2SgCdWKEmpBGTcPTYySh03BchyI9Hbt0dit/3n VXpzU6ReqCMhySOdD8vTLJRw6AjJR7dkksa57Ah+himHghC8xrSWy5mbcgtgp3UDSd0K Pi8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWVzo/yYZq5yCLL8KMQnd9IBIYXw1RiFKLahl9WY+lXLRQZtXaK cJc0NuRIGaT+cSDKTqiTxnCtdtuhF3Mf+MKcnYs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdYwqrHJQ39GJGnL5rgpjr2N4T4KrOxqPjif5uTV9eXkvwz3vvNAczrCsGtdQmjlgRVKlnMU+HGaEq9dNUTig= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9159:: with SMTP id 25mr83129430pfi.64.1558715397273; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:29:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190513075641.1277716-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> <20190513075641.1277716-2-lkundrak@v3.sk> <20190513090743.GA19319@amd> <5e814f2a3b1282da53d0f828dd9276ca91952f75.camel@v3.sk> In-Reply-To: <5e814f2a3b1282da53d0f828dd9276ca91952f75.camel@v3.sk> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 19:29:45 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] dt-bindings: olpc,xo1.75-ec: Add OLPC XO-1.75 EC bindings To: Lubomir Rintel Cc: Pavel Machek , Andy Shevchenko , Darren Hart , Rob Herring , Russell King , Mark Rutland , Platform Driver , Linux PM , Sebastian Reichel , Rob Herring Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 4:18 PM Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 11:07 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2019-05-13 09:56:32, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > The OLPC XO-1.75 Embedded Controller is a SPI master that uses extra > > > signals for handshaking. It needs to know when is the slave (Linux) > > > side's TX FIFO ready for transfer (the ready-gpio signal on the SPI > > > controller node) and when does it wish to respond with a command (the > > > cmd-gpio property). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring > > > > Who is expected to apply this? I don't think more iterations will make > > it better... it seems pretty good already :-). > > The whole set is meant to go in through platform/x86; it just missed > 5.2 due to some issues discovered by the kbuild bot when it entered > Andy's review queue. It will be promoted in a few days to our for-next. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko