linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	qperret@google.com, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 4/6] sched/cpufreq: Introduce sugov_cpu_ramp_boost
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:55:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gP5v3LzU-uGyHpoJV8z+E2heR1PEQp+c=L7RZS3FzCWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200122173538.1142069-5-douglas.raillard@arm.com>

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 6:36 PM Douglas RAILLARD
<douglas.raillard@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Use the utilization signals dynamic to detect when the utilization of a
> set of tasks starts increasing because of a change in tasks' behavior.
> This allows detecting when spending extra power for faster frequency
> ramp up response would be beneficial to the reactivity of the system.
>
> This ramp boost is computed as the difference between util_avg and
> util_est_enqueued. This number somehow represents a lower bound of how
> much extra utilization this tasks is actually using, compared to our
> best current stable knowledge of it (which is util_est_enqueued).
>
> When the set of runnable tasks changes, the boost is disabled as the
> impact of blocked utilization on util_avg will make the delta with
> util_est_enqueued not very informative.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 608963da4916..25a410a1ff6a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
>         unsigned long           bw_dl;
>         unsigned long           max;
>
> +       unsigned long           ramp_boost;
> +       unsigned long           util_est_enqueued;
> +       unsigned long           util_avg;
> +
>         /* The field below is for single-CPU policies only: */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
>         unsigned long           saved_idle_calls;
> @@ -183,6 +187,42 @@ static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
>         }
>  }
>
> +static unsigned long sugov_cpu_ramp_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> +{
> +       return READ_ONCE(sg_cpu->ramp_boost);
> +}

Where exactly is this function used?

> +
> +static unsigned long sugov_cpu_ramp_boost_update(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> +{
> +       struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
> +       unsigned long util_est_enqueued;
> +       unsigned long util_avg;
> +       unsigned long boost = 0;
> +
> +       util_est_enqueued = READ_ONCE(rq->cfs.avg.util_est.enqueued);
> +       util_avg = READ_ONCE(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Boost when util_avg becomes higher than the previous stable
> +        * knowledge of the enqueued tasks' set util, which is CPU's
> +        * util_est_enqueued.
> +        *
> +        * We try to spot changes in the workload itself, so we want to
> +        * avoid the noise of tasks being enqueued/dequeued. To do that,
> +        * we only trigger boosting when the "amount of work" enqueued
> +        * is stable.
> +        */
> +       if (util_est_enqueued == sg_cpu->util_est_enqueued &&
> +           util_avg >= sg_cpu->util_avg &&
> +           util_avg > util_est_enqueued)
> +               boost = util_avg - util_est_enqueued;
> +
> +       sg_cpu->util_est_enqueued = util_est_enqueued;
> +       sg_cpu->util_avg = util_avg;
> +       WRITE_ONCE(sg_cpu->ramp_boost, boost);
> +       return boost;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * get_next_freq - Compute a new frequency for a given cpufreq policy.
>   * @sg_policy: schedutil policy object to compute the new frequency for.
> @@ -514,6 +554,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>         busy = !sg_policy->need_freq_update && sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu);
>
>         util = sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
> +       sugov_cpu_ramp_boost_update(sg_cpu);
>         max = sg_cpu->max;
>         util = sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, util, max);
>         next_f = get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max);
> @@ -554,6 +595,8 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
>                 unsigned long j_util, j_max;
>
>                 j_util = sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
> +               if (j_sg_cpu == sg_cpu)
> +                       sugov_cpu_ramp_boost_update(sg_cpu);
>                 j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
>                 j_util = sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time, j_util, j_max);
>
> --

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-23 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-22 17:35 [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware Douglas RAILLARD
2020-01-22 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/6] PM: Introduce em_pd_get_higher_freq() Douglas RAILLARD
2020-01-22 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] sched/cpufreq: Attach perf domain to sugov policy Douglas RAILLARD
2020-01-22 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] sched/cpufreq: Hook em_pd_get_higher_power() into get_next_freq() Douglas RAILLARD
2020-01-23 16:16   ` Quentin Perret
2020-01-23 17:52     ` Douglas Raillard
2020-01-24 14:37       ` Quentin Perret
2020-01-24 14:58         ` Quentin Perret
2020-02-27 15:51   ` Douglas Raillard
2020-01-22 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/6] sched/cpufreq: Introduce sugov_cpu_ramp_boost Douglas RAILLARD
2020-01-23 15:55   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-01-23 17:21     ` Douglas Raillard
2020-01-23 21:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-01-28 15:38         ` Douglas Raillard
2020-02-10 13:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-13 10:49     ` Douglas Raillard
2020-01-22 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/6] sched/cpufreq: Boost schedutil frequency ramp up Douglas RAILLARD
2020-01-22 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/6] sched/cpufreq: Add schedutil_em_tp tracepoint Douglas RAILLARD
2020-01-22 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware Douglas Raillard
2020-02-10 13:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-13 17:49     ` Douglas Raillard
2020-02-14 12:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-14 12:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-11 12:25         ` Douglas Raillard
2020-02-14 13:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-11 12:40         ` Douglas Raillard
2020-01-23 15:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-01-23 17:16   ` Douglas Raillard
2020-02-10 13:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-13 11:55       ` Douglas Raillard
2020-02-13 13:20         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-27 15:50           ` Douglas Raillard
2020-01-27 17:16 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-10 11:37   ` Douglas Raillard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0gP5v3LzU-uGyHpoJV8z+E2heR1PEQp+c=L7RZS3FzCWg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=douglas.raillard@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).