Linux-PM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub
@ 2019-06-24 13:17 Daniel Lezcano
  2019-06-24 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy Daniel Lezcano
  2019-06-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub Viresh Kumar
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2019-06-24 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: viresh.kumar; +Cc: rjw, edubezval, linux-kernel, linux-pm

The cpufreq_online and the cpufreq_offline [un]register the driver as
a cooling device. This is done if the driver is flagged as a cooling
device in addition with a IS_ENABLED macro to compile out the branching
code.

Group this test in a stub function added in the cpufreq header instead
of having the IS_ENABLED in the code path.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++----
 include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 85ff958e01f1..aee024e42618 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1378,8 +1378,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 	if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
 		cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL) &&
-	    cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV)
+	if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
 		policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
 
 	pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
@@ -1469,8 +1468,7 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL) &&
-	    cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV) {
+	if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver)) {
 		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
 		policy->cdev = NULL;
 	}
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index d01a74fbc4db..53ec82d75565 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -409,6 +409,11 @@ int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
 const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver(void);
 void *cpufreq_get_driver_data(void);
 
+static inline int cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(struct cpufreq_driver *drv)
+{
+	return IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) && (drv->flags & CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV);
+}
+
 static inline void cpufreq_verify_within_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		unsigned int min, unsigned int max)
 {
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy
  2019-06-24 13:17 [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub Daniel Lezcano
@ 2019-06-24 13:17 ` Daniel Lezcano
  2019-06-24 22:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2019-06-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub Viresh Kumar
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2019-06-24 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: viresh.kumar
  Cc: rjw, edubezval, linux-kernel, Sudeep Holla, Amit Daniel Kachhap,
	Javi Merino, Zhang Rui, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, NXP Linux Team, Keerthy,
	linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap

Currently the function cpufreq_cooling_register() returns a cooling
device pointer which is used back as a pointer to call the function
cpufreq_cooling_unregister(). Even if it is correct, it would make
sense to not leak the structure inside a cpufreq driver and keep the
code thermal code self-encapsulate. Moreover, that forces to add an
extra variable in each driver using this function.

Instead of passing the cooling device to unregister, pass the policy.

Because the cpufreq_cooling_unregister() function uses the policy to
unregister itself. The only purpose of the cooling device pointer is
to unregister the cpu cooling device.

As there is no more need of this pointer, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c               |  9 +++------
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c                      | 10 ++++------
 drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c                  | 18 ++++++++++--------
 drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c                  | 12 ++++++------
 .../thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 10 +++++-----
 include/linux/cpu_cooling.h                    |  6 +++---
 include/linux/cpufreq.h                        |  3 ---
 7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
index 7fe52fcddcf1..718c63231e66 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static bool bL_switching_enabled;
 #define ACTUAL_FREQ(cluster, freq)  ((cluster == A7_CLUSTER) ? freq << 1 : freq)
 #define VIRT_FREQ(cluster, freq)    ((cluster == A7_CLUSTER) ? freq >> 1 : freq)
 
-static struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev[MAX_CLUSTERS];
 static const struct cpufreq_arm_bL_ops *arm_bL_ops;
 static struct clk *clk[MAX_CLUSTERS];
 static struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table[MAX_CLUSTERS + 1];
@@ -501,10 +500,8 @@ static int bL_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	struct device *cpu_dev;
 	int cur_cluster = cpu_to_cluster(policy->cpu);
 
-	if (cur_cluster < MAX_CLUSTERS) {
-		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(cdev[cur_cluster]);
-		cdev[cur_cluster] = NULL;
-	}
+	if (cur_cluster < MAX_CLUSTERS)
+		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy);
 
 	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
 	if (!cpu_dev) {
@@ -527,7 +524,7 @@ static void bL_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	if (cur_cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS)
 		return;
 
-	cdev[cur_cluster] = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
+	of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
 }
 
 static struct cpufreq_driver bL_cpufreq_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index aee024e42618..f07454249fbc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1379,8 +1379,8 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 		cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
 
 	if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
-		policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
-
+		of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
+	
 	pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1468,10 +1468,8 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 
-	if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver)) {
-		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
-		policy->cdev = NULL;
-	}
+	if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
+		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy);
 
 	if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
 		cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
index 83486775e593..007c7c6bf845 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	struct list_head node;
 	struct time_in_idle *idle_time;
+	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
 };
 
 static DEFINE_IDA(cpufreq_ida);
@@ -606,6 +607,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
 		goto remove_ida;
 
 	cpufreq_cdev->clipped_freq = get_state_freq(cpufreq_cdev, 0);
+	cpufreq_cdev->cdev = cdev;
 
 	mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
 	/* Register the notifier for first cpufreq cooling device */
@@ -699,18 +701,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_cpufreq_cooling_register);
  *
  * This interface function unregisters the "thermal-cpufreq-%x" cooling device.
  */
-void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
+void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev;
 	bool last;
 
-	if (!cdev)
-		return;
-
-	cpufreq_cdev = cdev->devdata;
-
 	mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
-	list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node);
+	list_for_each_entry(cpufreq_cdev, &cpufreq_cdev_list, node) {
+		if (cpufreq_cdev->policy == policy) {
+			list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
 	/* Unregister the notifier for the last cpufreq cooling device */
 	last = list_empty(&cpufreq_cdev_list);
 	mutex_unlock(&cooling_list_lock);
@@ -719,7 +721,7 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
 		cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block,
 					    CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
 
-	thermal_cooling_device_unregister(cdev);
+	thermal_cooling_device_unregister(cpufreq_cdev->cdev);
 	ida_simple_remove(&cpufreq_ida, cpufreq_cdev->id);
 	kfree(cpufreq_cdev->idle_time);
 	kfree(cpufreq_cdev);
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
index bb6754a5342c..021c0948b740 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
@@ -203,7 +203,6 @@ static struct thermal_soc_data thermal_imx7d_data = {
 struct imx_thermal_data {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
-	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
 	enum thermal_device_mode mode;
 	struct regmap *tempmon;
 	u32 c1, c2; /* See formula in imx_init_calib() */
@@ -656,6 +655,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_imx_thermal_match);
 static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
+	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
 	int ret;
 
 	data->policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0);
@@ -667,9 +667,9 @@ static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data)
 	np = of_get_cpu_node(data->policy->cpu, NULL);
 
 	if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) {
-		data->cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
-		if (IS_ERR(data->cdev)) {
-			ret = PTR_ERR(data->cdev);
+		cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
+		if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(cdev);
 			cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
 			return ret;
 		}
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data)
 
 static void imx_thermal_unregister_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data)
 {
-	cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cdev);
+	cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->policy);
 	cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
 }
 
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		clk_disable_unprepare(data->thermal_clk);
 
 	thermal_zone_device_unregister(data->tz);
-	cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cdev);
+	cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->policy);
 	cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
index b4f981daeaf2..170b70b6ec61 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ struct ti_thermal_data {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	struct thermal_zone_device *ti_thermal;
 	struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz;
-	struct thermal_cooling_device *cool_dev;
 	struct ti_bandgap *bgp;
 	enum thermal_device_mode mode;
 	struct work_struct thermal_wq;
@@ -233,6 +232,7 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
 {
 	struct ti_thermal_data *data;
 	struct device_node *np = bgp->dev->of_node;
+	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
 
 	/*
 	 * We are assuming here that if one deploys the zone
@@ -256,9 +256,9 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
 	}
 
 	/* Register cooling device */
-	data->cool_dev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
-	if (IS_ERR(data->cool_dev)) {
-		int ret = PTR_ERR(data->cool_dev);
+	cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
+	if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
+		int ret = PTR_ERR(cdev);
 		dev_err(bgp->dev, "Failed to register cpu cooling device %d\n",
 			ret);
 		cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ int ti_thermal_unregister_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
 	data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id);
 
 	if (data) {
-		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cool_dev);
+		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->policy);
 		if (data->policy)
 			cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
 	}
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
index bae54bb7c048..89f469ee4be4 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 
 /**
  * cpufreq_cooling_unregister - function to remove cpufreq cooling device.
- * @cdev: thermal cooling device pointer.
+ * @policy: cpufreq policy
  */
-void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev);
+void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL */
 static inline struct thermal_cooling_device *
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 }
 
 static inline
-void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
+void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	return;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 53ec82d75565..81ac78353f79 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -144,9 +144,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
 
 	/* For cpufreq driver's internal use */
 	void			*driver_data;
-
-	/* Pointer to the cooling device if used for thermal mitigation */
-	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
 };
 
 struct cpufreq_freqs {
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub
  2019-06-24 13:17 [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub Daniel Lezcano
  2019-06-24 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy Daniel Lezcano
@ 2019-06-24 13:59 ` Viresh Kumar
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2019-06-24 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Lezcano
  Cc: rjw, edubezval, linux-kernel, open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK

On 24-06-19, 15:17, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The cpufreq_online and the cpufreq_offline [un]register the driver as
> a cooling device. This is done if the driver is flagged as a cooling
> device in addition with a IS_ENABLED macro to compile out the branching
> code.
> 
> Group this test in a stub function added in the cpufreq header instead
> of having the IS_ENABLED in the code path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++----
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy
  2019-06-24 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy Daniel Lezcano
@ 2019-06-24 22:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2019-06-24 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Lezcano
  Cc: Viresh Kumar, Rafael J. Wysocki, Eduardo Valentin,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Sudeep Holla, Amit Daniel Kachhap,
	Javi Merino, Zhang Rui, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, NXP Linux Team, Keerthy,
	open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS - ARM BIG LITTLE,
	moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE,
	open list:TI BANDGAP AND THERMAL DRIVER

) On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:17 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Currently the function cpufreq_cooling_register() returns a cooling
> device pointer which is used back as a pointer to call the function
> cpufreq_cooling_unregister(). Even if it is correct, it would make
> sense to not leak the structure inside a cpufreq driver and keep the
> code thermal code self-encapsulate. Moreover, that forces to add an
> extra variable in each driver using this function.

[cut]

> @@ -667,9 +667,9 @@ static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data)
>         np = of_get_cpu_node(data->policy->cpu, NULL);
>
>         if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) {
> -               data->cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
> -               if (IS_ERR(data->cdev)) {
> -                       ret = PTR_ERR(data->cdev);
> +               cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);

It looks like after the changes in this patch the only reason for
returning (struct thermal_cooling_device *) from
cpufreq_cooling_register() is error checking, but it would be much
more straightforward to return int for this purpose.

Moreover, that would prevent the callers of it from doing incorrect
things with the returned pointers (like using it to unregister the
cooling device).

> +               if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
> +                       ret = PTR_ERR(cdev);
>                         cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
>                         return ret;
>                 }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-24 13:17 [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 22:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub Viresh Kumar

Linux-PM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/0 linux-pm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pm linux-pm/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm \
		linux-pm@vger.kernel.org linux-pm@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-pm


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox