linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [pm:bleeding-edge 6/7] drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c:454:1: warning: the frame size of 2960 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 10:30:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hO7TUado+foOX7QN7nGKKk5Ha7JV8QBYLk3594ky5kMg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201912040922.hUcG8uqP%lkp@intel.com>

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 2:07 AM kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git bleeding-edge
> head:   88a29de6adffb9d4d1ac7f1b1d996c616ebda145
> commit: 80e0582b1ab83ed08dedaad5a0cdb28457ccba4f [6/7] software node: add basic tests for property entries
> config: arm64-randconfig-a001-20191203 (attached as .config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> reproduce:
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         git checkout 80e0582b1ab83ed08dedaad5a0cdb28457ccba4f
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c: In function 'pe_test_reference':
> >> drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c:454:1: warning: the frame size of 2960 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>     }
>     ^
>    drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c: In function 'pe_test_uint_arrays':
>    drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c:214:1: warning: the frame size of 4288 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>     }
>     ^
>    drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c: In function 'pe_test_uints':
>    drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c:99:1: warning: the frame size of 2736 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>     }
>     ^

Dmitry, any comments on this?

Perhaps I should drop the tests patch until this is resolved or clarified?

> vim +454 drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
>
>    360
>    361  /* Handling of reference properties */
>    362  static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
>    363  {
>    364          const struct software_node nodes[] = {
>    365                  { .name = "1", },
>    366                  { .name = "2", },
>    367          };
>    368
>    369          const struct software_node_ref_args refs[] = {
>    370                  {
>    371                          .node = &nodes[0],
>    372                          .nargs = 0,
>    373                  },
>    374                  {
>    375                          .node = &nodes[1],
>    376                          .nargs = 2,
>    377                          .args = { 3, 4 },
>    378                  },
>    379          };
>    380
>    381          const struct property_entry entries[] = {
>    382                  PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-1", &nodes[0]),
>    383                  PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-2", &nodes[1], 1, 2),
>    384                  PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY("ref-3", refs),
>    385                  { }
>    386          };
>    387
>    388          struct fwnode_handle *node;
>    389          struct fwnode_reference_args ref;
>    390          int error;
>    391
>    392          error = software_node_register_nodes(nodes);
>    393          KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
>    394
>    395          node = fwnode_create_software_node(entries, NULL);
>    396          KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, node);
>    397
>    398          error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-1", NULL,
>    399                                                     0, 0, &ref);
>    400          KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
>    401          KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[0]);
>    402          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 0U);
>    403
>    404          /* wrong index */
>    405          error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-1", NULL,
>    406                                                     0, 1, &ref);
>    407          KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
>    408
>    409          error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-2", NULL,
>    410                                                     1, 0, &ref);
>    411          KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
>    412          KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[1]);
>    413          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 1U);
>    414          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[0], 1LLU);
>    415
>    416          /* asking for more args, padded with zero data */
>    417          error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-2", NULL,
>    418                                                     3, 0, &ref);
>    419          KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
>    420          KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[1]);
>    421          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 3U);
>    422          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[0], 1LLU);
>    423          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[1], 2LLU);
>    424          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[2], 0LLU);
>    425
>    426          /* wrong index */
>    427          error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-2", NULL,
>    428                                                     2, 1, &ref);
>    429          KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
>    430
>    431          /* array of references */
>    432          error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-3", NULL,
>    433                                                     0, 0, &ref);
>    434          KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
>    435          KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[0]);
>    436          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 0U);
>    437
>    438          /* second reference in the array */
>    439          error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-3", NULL,
>    440                                                     2, 1, &ref);
>    441          KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
>    442          KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[1]);
>    443          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 2U);
>    444          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[0], 3LLU);
>    445          KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[1], 4LLU);
>    446
>    447          /* wrong index */
>    448          error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-1", NULL,
>    449                                                     0, 2, &ref);
>    450          KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
>    451
>    452          fwnode_remove_software_node(node);
>    453          software_node_unregister_nodes(nodes);
>  > 454  }
>    455
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-04  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04  1:07 [pm:bleeding-edge 6/7] drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c:454:1: warning: the frame size of 2960 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes kbuild test robot
2019-12-04  9:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-12-04 18:53   ` [PATCH v9] software node: add basic tests for property entries Dmitry Torokhov
2019-12-09  8:44     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-11 10:53       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-13  0:18         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-12-13 10:15           ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0hO7TUado+foOX7QN7nGKKk5Ha7JV8QBYLk3594ky5kMg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).