From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] cpufreq:boost: CPU Boost mode support
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:35:44 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=btXn-T8KVixzOJWYhkL5eatShHoq51h9b+ZvWdNXHgA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
	<1370941408-29304-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
	<CAKohpo=VpMvxMb-r4Hgga1ZM9m9egyUH_Ee+S=q25RdT7DAE-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130612080002.3f382ee1@amdc308.digital.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176]:59739 "EHLO
	mail-ob0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754679Ab3FLGFo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:05:44 -0400
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id v19so12809426obq.35
        for <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130612080002.3f382ee1@amdc308.digital.local>
Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
To: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocky" <rjw@sisk.pl>, "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com>, Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@linaro.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>

On 12 June 2013 11:30, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> As you pointed out in the other mail 1/3 has its own issues, but I
> think that patches 2/3 and 3/3 are an integral part of the boost
> support and bring better overall overview to the design.

Yes they are. Undoubtedly.

>> Maybe you can just send v3 of 1/3. 2/3 and 3/3 can be sent when we
>> have finalized 2/3 and 3/3 's version.
>
> I'd opt for sending the whole patchset (it shouldn't be so difficult to
> adjust those patches), since it is easier for me to test.

Okay.