From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] Documentation:cpufreq:boost: Update BOOST documentation Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:31:43 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1372927830-2949-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1372927830-2949-8-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1372927830-2949-8-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Jonghwa Lee , l.majewski@majess.pl, linux-kernel , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano , Kukjin Kim , Myungjoo Ham List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 4 July 2013 14:20, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > -Reading the file is always supported, even if the processor does not > -support boosting. In this case the file will be read-only and always > -reads as "0". Explicitly changing the permissions and writing to that > -file anyway will return EINVAL. > +The file is exported only when cpufreq driver supports boosting. > +Explicitly changing the permissions and writing to that file anyway will > +return EINVAL. For acpi-cpufreq reading the file should be always supported. And this must be mentioned in doc.