From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support boost framework Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:28:11 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1371661969-7660-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1371661969-7660-5-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1371661969-7660-5-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocky" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Vincent Guittot , Jonghwa Lee , Myungjoo Ham , linux-kernel , Lukasz Majewski , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano , Kukjin Kim , Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 19 June 2013 22:42, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > The struct cpufreq_driver has been extended to embrace the information > related to boost support. > > When "boost_mode" device tree attribute is defined for a platform, the > boost_supported flag is set. Moreover boost related attributes were > exported. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham > > Changes for v4: > - None > > Changes for v3: > - Remove low level boost code > - Move boost management code to cpufreq core code > - Use boost_supported flag to indicate if driver supports over clocking > > Changes for v2: > - Removal of struct cpufreq_boost > - Removal of the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST flag > - low_level_boost with valid address when boost is supported > --- > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) Yes, this looks fine.. I will Ack the whole series in the end, so no individual acks :)