From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support boost framework Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:18:57 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1372927830-2949-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1372927830-2949-5-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1372927830-2949-5-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Jonghwa Lee , l.majewski@majess.pl, linux-kernel , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano , Kukjin Kim , Myungjoo Ham List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 4 July 2013 14:20, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > The struct cpufreq_driver has been extended to embrace the information > related to boost support. > > When "boost_mode" device tree attribute is defined for a platform, the > boost_supported flag is set. Moreover boost related attributes were > exported. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham Don't we need to mark any frequencies in the freq table with BOOST? How?