From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] cpufreq: Store cpufreq policies in a list Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:44:29 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1374770011-22171-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1374770011-22171-2-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1374770011-22171-2-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Jonghwa Lee , Lukasz Majewski , linux-kernel , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Daniel Lezcano , Kukjin Kim , Myungjoo Ham , durgadoss.r@intel.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 25 July 2013 22:03, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Policies available in a cpufreq framework are now linked together. They are > accessible via cpufreq_policy_list defined at cpufreq core. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham Looks good but would have been better if you could have moved existing code to use this infrastructure.. For example, this code in __cpufreq_add_dev() #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU /* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has siblings */ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); for_each_online_cpu(sibling) { --- } read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); #endif