From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
Mike Turquette <mike.turquette@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>,
"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@gmail.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] cpufreq: Add "dvfs-method" binding to probe cpufreq drivers
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:19:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomBijLiBgV31ZhZDTctsTLccBZ+93r+esG-WRZAS4sqww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <596a6d49f2b3e2837aa9a54a3e1249161d3c9265.1416991009.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Fixing Santosh's email id as he switched employer ..
On 26 November 2014 at 14:16, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> DT based cpufreq drivers doesn't require much support from platform code now a
> days as most of the stuff is moved behind generic APIs. Like clk APIs for
> changing clock rates, regulator APIs for changing voltages, etc.
>
> One of the bottleneck still left was how to select which cpufreq driver to probe
> for a given platform as there might be multiple drivers available.
>
> Traditionally, we used to create platform devices from machine specific code
> which binds with a cpufreq driver. And while we moved towards DT based device
> creation, these devices stayed as is.
>
> The problem is getting worse now as we have architectures now with Zero platform
> specific code. Forcefully these platforms have to create a new file in
> drivers/cpufreq/ to just add these platform devices in order to use the generic
> drivers like cpufreq-dt.c.
>
> This has been discussed again and again, but with no solution yet. Last it was
> discussed here:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-May/256154.html
>
> This patch is an attempt towards getting the bindings.
>
> We only need to have one entry in cpus@cpu0 node which will match with drivers
> name.
>
> We can then add another file drivers/cpufreq/device_dt.c, which will add a
> platform device with the name it finds from cpus@cpu0 node and existing drivers
> will work without any change. Or something else if somebody have a better
> proposal. But lets fix the bindings first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/drivers.txt | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/drivers.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/drivers.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/drivers.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..bd14917
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/drivers.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> +Binding to select which cpufreq driver to register
> +
> +It is a generic DT binding for selecting which cpufreq-driver to register for
> +any platform.
> +
> +The property listed below must be defined under node /cpus/cpu@0 node. We don't
> +support multiple CPUFreq driver currently for different cluster and so this
> +information isn't required to be present in CPUs of all clusters.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- None
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- dvfs-method: CPUFreq driver to probe. For example: "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt",
> + "cpufreq-dt", etc
> +
> +Examples:
> +
> +cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu@0 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> + reg = <0>;
> + next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> + operating-points = <
> + /* kHz uV */
> + 792000 1100000
> + 396000 950000
> + 198000 850000
> + >;
> + dvfs-method = "cpufreq-dt";
> + };
> +
> + cpu@1 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> + reg = <1>;
> + next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu@2 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> + reg = <2>;
> + next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu@3 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> + reg = <3>;
> + next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> + };
> +};
> --
> 2.0.3.693.g996b0fd
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-26 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 8:46 [RFC] cpufreq: Add "dvfs-method" binding to probe cpufreq drivers Viresh Kumar
2014-11-26 8:49 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2014-11-26 16:34 ` santosh shilimkar
2014-11-27 5:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-30 20:04 ` santosh.shilimkar
2014-11-26 17:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-11-26 17:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-11-27 5:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-27 9:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-11-27 10:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-27 11:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-11-28 6:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-28 11:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-12-01 8:06 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKohpomBijLiBgV31ZhZDTctsTLccBZ+93r+esG-WRZAS4sqww@mail.gmail.com \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=k.chander@samsung.com \
--cc=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.turquette@linaro.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).