Linux-PM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
WARNING: multiple messages refer to this Message-ID
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: douglas.raillard@arm.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	quentin.perret@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 12:42:26 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOh2x=k23D_FefOnmLjExj1d+UiothgOmyUk=1mqFknpHNwWGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190508174301.4828-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com>

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:57 PM <douglas.raillard@arm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
>
> Make schedutil cpufreq governor energy-aware.

Hi Douglas,

I was wondering on why the cpufreq maintainers weren't cc'd for this set and
then I noticed that get_maintainers doesn't report us at all for schedutil :(

I have sent a patch to fix that, but please include us as well in the
future even
if get_maintainers doesn't report us :)

--
viresh

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: douglas.raillard@arm.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	quentin.perret@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 12:42:26 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOh2x=k23D_FefOnmLjExj1d+UiothgOmyUk=1mqFknpHNwWGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190513071226.rnQY85NVQ-SL6JmCgpe_sAcqqBBNCi2c5_-LgS_JRh8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190508174301.4828-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com>

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:57 PM <douglas.raillard@arm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
>
> Make schedutil cpufreq governor energy-aware.

Hi Douglas,

I was wondering on why the cpufreq maintainers weren't cc'd for this set and
then I noticed that get_maintainers doesn't report us at all for schedutil :(

I have sent a patch to fix that, but please include us as well in the
future even
if get_maintainers doesn't report us :)

--
viresh

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-08 17:42 douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] PM: Introduce em_pd_get_higher_freq() douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42   ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-16 12:42   ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-16 12:42     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-16 13:01     ` Quentin Perret
2019-05-16 13:01       ` Quentin Perret
2019-05-16 13:22       ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-16 13:22         ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-19 16:08         ` Douglas Raillard
2019-06-20 13:04           ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21 10:17             ` Quentin Perret
2019-06-21 10:22               ` Quentin Perret
2019-05-16 13:06     ` Douglas Raillard
2019-05-16 13:06       ` Douglas Raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] sched/cpufreq: Attach perf domain to sugov policy douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42   ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] sched/cpufreq: Hook em_pd_get_higher_power() into get_next_freq() douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42   ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] sched/cpufreq: Move up sugov_cpu_is_busy() douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42   ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] sched/cpufreq: sugov_cpu_is_busy for shared policy douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42   ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] sched/cpufreq: Improve sugov_cpu_is_busy accuracy douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:43   ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-16 12:55   ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-16 12:55     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-19 16:19     ` Douglas Raillard
2019-06-20 11:05       ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] sched/cpufreq: Boost schedutil frequency ramp up douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:43   ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-13  7:12 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2019-05-13  7:12   ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware Viresh Kumar
2019-05-13 13:52   ` Douglas Raillard
2019-05-13 13:52     ` Douglas Raillard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOh2x=k23D_FefOnmLjExj1d+UiothgOmyUk=1mqFknpHNwWGg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=douglas.raillard@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-PM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/0 linux-pm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pm linux-pm/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm \
		linux-pm@vger.kernel.org linux-pm@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-pm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox