From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME in core code Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:34:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1803282.Wzz7IausxS@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1803282.Wzz7IausxS@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Alan Stern , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux PM list , Linux PCI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Bjorn Helgaas , Kevin Hilman List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org [...] > That said whether or not it is ever useful to set PM_RUNTIME alone is a good > question. In my opinion it is useful today, at least on some platforms that > don't really support system suspend or hibernation in any form. However, it > may not be the case any more when suspend-to-idle becomes mature enough, > because that should just work for any platform without any kind of special > support. We're still missing some timekeeping bits there, but once that > gap has been covered, we may just eliminate PM_SLEEP as well if there's a > broad consensus on that. That's sounds like a good approach, thanks for sharing your ideas and plans. Feel free to add my reviewed-by tag to this patchset as well. Kind regards Uffe