From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: Extend RPMh power controller binding to describe thermal warming device
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:06:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpiyvGg0+bXDVCbfr+yW0SOH6DhVgAiav8ZnE8TSF6EHQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191029013648.GB27045@bogus>
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 02:36, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:10:15PM -0400, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> > On 10/17/2019 11:43 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 17:28, Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello Ulf,
> > >> Thanks for the review!
> > >>
> > >> On 10/17/2019 05:04 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 21:37, Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> RPMh power controller hosts mx domain that can be used as thermal
> > >>>> warming device. Add a sub-node to specify this.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt | 10 ++++++++++
> > >>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
> > >>>> index eb35b22..fff695d 100644
> > >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
> > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt
> > >>>> @@ -18,6 +18,16 @@ Required Properties:
> > >>>> Refer to <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h> for the level values for
> > >>>> various OPPs for different platforms as well as Power domain indexes
> > >>>>
> > >>>> += SUBNODES
> > >>>> +RPMh alsp hosts power domains that can behave as thermal warming device.
> > >>>> +These are expressed as subnodes of the RPMh. The name of the node is used
> > >>>> +to identify the power domain and must therefor be "mx".
> > >>>> +
> > >>>> +- #cooling-cells:
> > >>>> + Usage: optional
> > >>>> + Value type: <u32>
> > >>>> + Definition: must be 2
> > >>>> +
> > >>>
> > >>> Just wanted to express a minor thought about this. In general we use
> > >>> subnodes of PM domain providers to represent the topology of PM
> > >>> domains (subdomains), this is something different, which I guess is
> > >>> fine.
> > >>>
> > >>> I assume the #cooling-cells is here tells us this is not a PM domain
> > >>> provider, but a "cooling device provider"?
> > >> Yep.
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, I wonder if it would be fine to specify "power-domains" here,
> > >>> rather than using "name" as I think that is kind of awkward!?
> > >> Do you mean "power-domain-names" ? I am using this to match against the
> > >> genpd names defined in the provider driver.
> > >
> > > No. If you are using "power-domains" it means that you allow to
> > > describe the specifier for the provider.
> > Yep. But won't this look funny in DT ? The provider node will have a sub
> > node with a power domain referencing to itself Like below: Is this ok ?
> >
> > rpmhpd: power-controller {
> > compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd";
> > #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> >
> > ...
> > ...
> > mx_cdev: mx {
> > #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > power-domains = <&rpmhpd SDM845_MX>;
> > };
> >
>
> The whole concept here seems all wrong to me. Isn't it what's in the
> power domain that's the cooling device. A CPU power domain is not a
> cooling device, the CPU is. Or we wouldn't make a clock a cooling
> device, but what the clock drives.
Well, I don't think that's entirely correct description either.
As I see it, it's really the actual PM domain (that manages voltages
for a power island), that needs to stay in full power state and
increase its voltage level, as to warm up some of the silicon. It's
not a regular device, but more a characteristics of how the PM domain
can be used.
Kind regards
Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-29 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 19:37 [PATCH v3 0/7]Introduce Power domain based warming device driver Thara Gopinath
2019-10-16 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] PM/Domains: Add support for retrieving genpd performance states information Thara Gopinath
2019-10-17 8:49 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-17 16:11 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-10-16 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Introduce function to retrieve power domain performance state count Thara Gopinath
2019-10-16 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] thermal: core: Add late init hook to cooling device ops Thara Gopinath
2019-12-03 17:04 ` Amit Kucheria
2019-12-03 17:09 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-12-03 17:11 ` Amit Kucheria
2019-10-16 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] thermal: Add generic power domain warming device driver Thara Gopinath
2019-10-17 8:47 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-17 15:46 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-10-16 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] soc: qcom: Extend RPMh power controller driver to register warming devices Thara Gopinath
2019-10-16 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: Extend RPMh power controller binding to describe thermal warming device Thara Gopinath
2019-10-17 9:04 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-17 15:28 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-10-17 15:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-17 16:10 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-10-29 1:36 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-29 10:06 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2019-10-29 20:16 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-30 9:27 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-30 14:27 ` Thara Gopinath
2019-10-16 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add mx power domain as " Thara Gopinath
2019-10-29 1:31 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-30 14:23 ` Thara Gopinath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPDyKFpiyvGg0+bXDVCbfr+yW0SOH6DhVgAiav8ZnE8TSF6EHQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=thara.gopinath@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).