linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@panix.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Help me fix a regression caused by 56b9918490 (PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flow)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:35:49 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911220929540.24730@hp-x360n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gKvDb8=Y04DB3wQe0rK8Zfw5yNuAybV980ozxfmem=BQ@mail.gmail.com>


On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > > > - Randomly, if left suspended, nothing other than a hard power off will get
> > > >   it back  ...  It appears "ec_no_wakeup=1" doesn't have this issue

> BTW, is the ec_no_wakeup=1 workaround still effective?

I'm pretty sure that's always effective, but:

> If so, does the lid and/or power button wake up the system from
> suspend with ec_no_wakeup=1?

No, hitting a key on the keyboard is the only thing that wakes it up. This
actually isn't a bad thing for me at all- but as per my previous E-mail I'm
trying to determine the cause for the occasional much higher suspended idle
draw and I was thinking using these workarounds means I'm not taking advantage
of all the suspend optimisations you've added.

That being said, I do have "XHC" disabled as a wakeup source (written to
/proc/acpi/wakeup) else BT mouse movement would wake this thing up.

	-Kenny

-- 
Kenneth R. Crudup  Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Silicon Valley

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-22 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-22  0:11 Help me fix a regression caused by 56b9918490 (PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flow) Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-22 10:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-22 12:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-22 17:35     ` Kenneth R. Crudup [this message]
2019-11-23 10:24     ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-24 16:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-25  3:40         ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-25 13:27           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-25 14:14             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-25 18:27               ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-25 20:11                 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-25 20:19                   ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-25 22:01                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-25 23:32                     ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-26  8:50                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-26 16:12                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-26 16:15                         ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-26 16:27                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-26 16:35                             ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-26 18:48                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-26 19:03                                 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-26 19:09                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-26 19:13                                     ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-26 19:45                                     ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-26 23:56                                     ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-27  2:35                                       ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-27  8:31                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-27 22:30                                           ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-28 16:25                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-25 21:47                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-25 16:21             ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-25 21:46               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-25 23:02                 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-26  8:53                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-25  5:50         ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-25  7:17           ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2019-11-22 17:29   ` Kenneth R. Crudup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1911220929540.24730@hp-x360n \
    --to=kenny@panix.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).