From: Nicholas Humfrey <njh@aelius.com>
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Configuring pppd to accept link-local IPv6 interface id from remote peer
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:42:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c05578d-6212-3e64-16e3-1aa5b3c67e34@aelius.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d529e496-ac5f-9498-0e3d-1fa1ec2c4750@aelius.com>
On 14/02/2021 01:57, Michael Richardson wrote
> Nicholas Humfrey <njh@aelius.com> wrote:
> > I have two pppd (v2.4.7) instances running, talking to each over over a
> > serial port link. But I can't work out how to get the 'client' pppd to
> > accept the link-local IPv6 interface identifier provided by the
> > 'server' pppd. I am trying to use static addresses so I know the
> > link-local IP address of the remote peer.
>
> So, basically you want to have ppp running with unnumbered links, and then
> maybe you do routing over that?
>
> I am not surprised that this hasn't been tested, and that there are bugs.
> Mostly, IP6CP assigns random IPv6-LL.
I guess it does surprise me that there are bugs! I had been assuming
that I was doing something wrong but the more I look at it, the more it
looks like a bug.
> If your goal is routing over unnumbered links, you don't really need the
> destination IPv6-LL to route to, it's enough to "dev ppp0" or whatever.
Yeah, that is perfectly fair. I did get static global IPv6 addresses and
routing working, so the actual link-local address I guess isn't that
important.
Just a bit frustrating not being able to achieve something that seems
like it should be possible.
Thanks!
nick.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-14 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-14 1:03 Configuring pppd to accept link-local IPv6 interface id from remote peer Nicholas Humfrey
2021-02-14 1:57 ` Michael Richardson
2021-02-14 13:42 ` Nicholas Humfrey [this message]
2021-02-14 16:23 ` James Carlson
2021-02-14 17:07 ` Kurt Van Dijck
2021-02-14 17:50 ` James Carlson
2021-02-14 21:24 ` Benjamin Cama
2021-02-14 22:46 ` James Carlson
2021-02-14 23:15 ` Benjamin Cama
2021-02-16 0:10 ` Nicholas Humfrey
2021-02-16 10:04 ` Benjamin Cama
2021-02-18 0:18 ` Nicholas Humfrey
2021-02-20 1:13 ` Nicholas Humfrey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c05578d-6212-3e64-16e3-1aa5b3c67e34@aelius.com \
--to=njh@aelius.com \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).