linux-ppp.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gfree.wind@vip.163.com
To: paulus@samba.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
	g.nault@alphalink.fr, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@vip.163.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] ppp: remove unnecessary bh disable in xmit path
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:58:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496311119-59204-1-git-send-email-gfree.wind@vip.163.com> (raw)

From: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@vip.163.com>

Since the commit 55454a565836 ("ppp: avoid dealock on recursive xmit"),
the PPP xmit path is protected by wrapper functions which disable the
bh already. So it is unnecessary to disable the bh again in the real
xmit path.

Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@vip.163.com>
---
 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
index f9c0e62..bbded33 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
@@ -1618,7 +1618,7 @@ static void ppp_xmit_process(struct ppp *ppp)
 		list = list->next;
 		pch = list_entry(list, struct channel, clist);
 
-		spin_lock_bh(&pch->downl);
+		spin_lock(&pch->downl);
 		if (pch->chan) {
 			if (pch->chan->ops->start_xmit(pch->chan, skb))
 				ppp->xmit_pending = NULL;
@@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ static void ppp_xmit_process(struct ppp *ppp)
 			kfree_skb(skb);
 			ppp->xmit_pending = NULL;
 		}
-		spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+		spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ static int ppp_mp_explode(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		}
 
 		/* check the channel's mtu and whether it is still attached. */
-		spin_lock_bh(&pch->downl);
+		spin_lock(&pch->downl);
 		if (pch->chan = NULL) {
 			/* can't use this channel, it's being deregistered */
 			if (pch->speed = 0)
@@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ static int ppp_mp_explode(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 			else
 				totspeed -= pch->speed;
 
-			spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+			spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 			pch->avail = 0;
 			totlen = len;
 			totfree--;
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ static int ppp_mp_explode(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		 */
 		if (flen <= 0) {
 			pch->avail = 2;
-			spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+			spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1861,14 +1861,14 @@ static int ppp_mp_explode(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		len -= flen;
 		++ppp->nxseq;
 		bits = 0;
-		spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+		spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 	}
 	ppp->nxchan = i;
 
 	return 1;
 
  noskb:
-	spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+	spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 	if (ppp->debug & 1)
 		netdev_err(ppp->dev, "PPP: no memory (fragment)\n");
 	++ppp->dev->stats.tx_errors;
@@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@ static void __ppp_channel_push(struct channel *pch)
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct ppp *ppp;
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&pch->downl);
+	spin_lock(&pch->downl);
 	if (pch->chan) {
 		while (!skb_queue_empty(&pch->file.xq)) {
 			skb = skb_dequeue(&pch->file.xq);
@@ -1897,14 +1897,14 @@ static void __ppp_channel_push(struct channel *pch)
 		/* channel got deregistered */
 		skb_queue_purge(&pch->file.xq);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+	spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 	/* see if there is anything from the attached unit to be sent */
 	if (skb_queue_empty(&pch->file.xq)) {
-		read_lock_bh(&pch->upl);
+		read_lock(&pch->upl);
 		ppp = pch->ppp;
 		if (ppp)
 			__ppp_xmit_process(ppp);
-		read_unlock_bh(&pch->upl);
+		read_unlock(&pch->upl);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1



             reply	other threads:[~2017-06-01  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-01  9:58 gfree.wind [this message]
2017-06-01 10:43 ` [PATCH net-next] ppp: remove unnecessary bh disable in xmit path Guillaume Nault
2017-06-01 16:01 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1496311119-59204-1-git-send-email-gfree.wind@vip.163.com \
    --to=gfree.wind@vip.163.com \
    --cc=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
    --cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).