* Re: possible deadlock in ppp_dev_uninit
[not found] <001a11c006da57e7ff0561edda2b@google.com>
@ 2018-01-05 18:15 ` Guillaume Nault
2018-01-05 18:27 ` Guillaume Nault
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guillaume Nault @ 2018-01-05 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-ppp, netdev, paulus, syzkaller-bugs
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:58:01PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ======================
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> 4.15.0-rc6-next-20180103+ #87 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------
> syzkaller221540/3462 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&pn->all_ppp_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000709ea4fe>]
> ppp_dev_uninit+0x1be/0x390 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:1369
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&pn->all_ppp_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000752caad5>] ppp_unit_register
> drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:981 [inline]
> (&pn->all_ppp_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000752caad5>]
> ppp_dev_configure+0x6a4/0xc40 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:1066
>
ppp_unit_register() acquires pn->all_ppp_mutex while calling
register_netdevice(). If register_netdevice() fails, it can call
ppp_dev_uninit() which then tries to lock pn->all_ppp_mutex again.
Maybe unlocking pn->all_ppp_mutex before register_netdevice() would be
enough, but that'd make the unit visible while the PPP device isn't yet
registered. I'm going to check if that can be a problem.
That's probably worth a test anyway.
#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git master
-------- 8< --------
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
index d8e5747ff4e3..264d4af0bf69 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
@@ -1006,17 +1006,18 @@ static int ppp_unit_register(struct ppp *ppp, int unit, bool ifname_is_set)
if (!ifname_is_set)
snprintf(ppp->dev->name, IFNAMSIZ, "ppp%i", ppp->file.index);
+ mutex_unlock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
+
ret = register_netdevice(ppp->dev);
if (ret < 0)
goto err_unit;
atomic_inc(&ppp_unit_count);
- mutex_unlock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
-
return 0;
err_unit:
+ mutex_lock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
unit_put(&pn->units_idr, ppp->file.index);
err:
mutex_unlock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread