From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 21:00:27 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] net-PPP: Delete an unnecessary assignment in mppe_alloc() Message-Id: <54821CEB.2020002@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547B4886.4080406@users.sourceforge.net> <547B496E.604@users.sourceforge.net> <547C5CBC.6060607@cogentembedded.com> <547C82A6.2030808@users.sourceforge.net> <547CA157.1080401@cogentembedded.com> <5480DA32.8000201@users.sourceforge.net> <5480DDC1.6040101@users.sourceforge.net> <20141205122214.GB4912@mwanda> <5481A8AE.9050506@users.sourceforge.net> <20141205135723.GE4912@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20141205135723.GE4912@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Paul Mackerras , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall >> That is true. > > In that case, I misunderstood what you wrote. I find it a bit interesting how this misunderstanding could happen here somehow. > Looking at it now, this patch is actually ok. Does that mean that you would like to add any tag like "Acked-by" or "Reviewed-by" to any of the proposed six update steps? Regards, Markus