linux-ppp.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com,
	linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:36:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65002c1e-5e31-1f4e-283c-186e06e55ef0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616110944.c13f221e5c3f54e775190afe@linux-foundation.org>

On 6/16/20 2:09 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:43:11 -0400 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> As said by Linus:
>>
>>    A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use.
>>    Otherwise it's actively misleading.
>>
>>    In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the
>>    caller wants.
>>
>>    In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the
>>    future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or
>>    something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_.
>>
>> The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information
>> that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory
>> objects.
>>
>> Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the
>> recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API
>> more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the
>> memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler.
>>
>> The renaming is done by using the command sequence:
>>
>>    git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\
>>    xargs sed -i 's/\bkzfree\b/kfree_sensitive/'
>>
>> followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding
>> a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> @@ -186,10 +186,12 @@ void memcg_deactivate_kmem_caches(struct mem_cgroup *, struct mem_cgroup *);
>>    */
>>   void * __must_check krealloc(const void *, size_t, gfp_t);
>>   void kfree(const void *);
>> -void kzfree(const void *);
>> +void kfree_sensitive(const void *);
>>   size_t __ksize(const void *);
>>   size_t ksize(const void *);
>>   
>> +#define kzfree(x)	kfree_sensitive(x)	/* For backward compatibility */
>> +
> What was the thinking here?  Is this really necessary?
>
> I suppose we could keep this around for a while to ease migration.  But
> not for too long, please.
>
It should be there just for 1 release cycle. I have broken out the btrfs 
patch to the btrfs list and I didn't make the kzfree to kfree_sensitive 
conversion there as that patch was in front in my patch list. So 
depending on which one lands first, there can be a window where the 
compilation may fail without this workaround. I am going to send out 
another patch in the next release cycle to remove it.

Cheers,
Longman

      reply	other threads:[~2020-06-16 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16 15:43 [PATCH v5 0/2] " Waiman Long
2020-06-16 15:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] mm/slab: Use memzero_explicit() in kzfree() Waiman Long
2020-06-16 15:43 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() Waiman Long
2020-06-16 18:09   ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-16 18:36     ` Waiman Long [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65002c1e-5e31-1f4e-283c-186e06e55ef0@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).