Hello Konstantin(?),

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 04:15:33PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 07:05:58PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:26:18AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > I consider the archives on lore.kernel.org very useful and would like to
> > > see the linux-pwm list archived there, too.
> > > 
> > > Assuming you agree (or at least don't disagree) we'd need to follow
> > > https://korg.wiki.kernel.org/userdoc/lore. Therefor we need an archive
> > > of the already sent mails. My personal archive only goes back to Oct
> > > 2018, so I guess I'm not in the best position to provide it. But I can
> > > nevertheless care for the buerocratics and start with my archive given
> > > that I get some support from someone with a more complete archive.
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> > I didn't get feedback from Thierry (= linux-pwm maintainer) but I still
> > think adding linux-pwm to kernel.org's public-inbox instance is
> > valuable. (And if it's only to experiment with b4.)
> 
> In the meantime Thierry said to support the idea to get the linux-pwm
> list archived on lore.kernel.org and also provide his archive for the
> initial population.
> 
> I assume you're OK in principle to archive linux-pwm and it's "just" a
> matter of lacking time to work on getting this list up and running on
> lore.k.o? Is there anything we can do to simplify the things for you?

Do you get my mail? Is there some problem with the request, or is it
just -ENOTIME on your end? Would it help to already initialize a public
inbox v2 repository?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |