Hello,

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:36:38PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > v9: 
> > 	- Removed the header file and put the definitions into the c file.
> > 	- Updated the pwm code and error logs with %pE
> 
> I believe the %pE is to format an escaped buffer, you probably want to
> %pe (lowercase) to print errors. I am also not quite sure if we want to
> use it in cases when we have non-pointer error, or we should stick with
> %d as most of the kernel does.

compared with %d %pe is easier to understand as it emits "-ETIMEOUT"
instead of "-110". And yes, %pE is wrong.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |