Hello Guenter,

On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:32:19AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > If I understand correctly this surprising calling convention (output
> > parameter is filled even though the function returned an error) is the
> > old one that is to be fixed.
>
> Sorry, I don't get your point. This is the old convention, correct,
> which we still want to support at this point. Plus, it matches the
> current code, as surprosing as it may be.

OK, so I understood correctly and everything is fine.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |