From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB671C433DF for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F4F206B5 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726501AbgHLGkv (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 02:40:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59094 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726255AbgHLGkv (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 02:40:51 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0508C06174A for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 23:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pty.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c5]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k5kRH-0007HF-PD; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:40:43 +0200 Received: from ukl by pty.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1k5kRF-00072c-Ph; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:40:41 +0200 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:40:41 +0200 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: "Tanwar, Rahul" Cc: Rob Herring , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, lee.jones@linaro.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@intel.com, songjun.Wu@intel.com, cheol.yong.kim@intel.com, qi-ming.wu@intel.com, rahul.tanwar.linux@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] Add DT bindings YAML schema for PWM fan controller of LGM SoC Message-ID: <20200812064041.e75p5neq7wcg5dag@pengutronix.de> References: <20200731181944.GB516550@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5u42du46nfyz3lys" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c5 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org --5u42du46nfyz3lys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Rahul, On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:49:14AM +0800, Tanwar, Rahul wrote: > Our PWM controller is actually a PWM fan controller dedicated for > controlling fan. I am looking for some suggestions from you on how > to handle fan related optional properties in such a scenario. >=20 > Should i create a separate child node for fan with PWM node being > the parent? Is that what you are suggesting? Thanks. What is the problem of just using pwm-fan? Best regards Uwe --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | --5u42du46nfyz3lys Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEfnIqFpAYrP8+dKQLwfwUeK3K7AkFAl8zjuYACgkQwfwUeK3K 7AmRFgf9Hj3Ye4VVPi0Zsv+m8e6Jx6F1XgWaK/KLQ5sBH32RoBdkOarZFf2pqcsN LbNgvrLiCRQWOmo3VdslgqmS8hefjaGsJOsromvz80sh864KQhe9BxjiFjqSGjAd E9EG1i2kE/zKS9p0Hb41juerIOHns9LoztpCPGUO/CajGa3fFXRHJ0jcACYciXtH swWCJysH3jPl7Bfxx6nf8/sg038vALQObFwI8166gtk2cT5UzrwqVIpR0EGw4dbE 5Enm9XTReWqzwd0VDPGAPmtnbfUS0EiOVmEsBNh7OxbMk0Tmv1jFngaOohkRkZiD OqTOL7Gq7DvyN+UfWmLG8C8xmXjIpA== =jsAe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5u42du46nfyz3lys--