From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Marek Vasut" <marex@denx.de>,
"Brian Norris" <briannorris@chromium.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: core: Permit unset period when applying configuration of disabled PWMs
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 20:18:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230511181853.185685-1-marex@denx.de> (raw)
In case the PWM is not enabled, the period can still be left unconfigured,
i.e. zero . Currently the pwm_class_apply_state() errors out in such a case.
This e.g. makes suspend fail on systems where pwmchip has been exported via
sysfs interface, but left unconfigured before suspend occurred.
Failing case:
"
$ echo 1 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/export
$ echo mem > /sys/power/state
...
pwm pwmchip4: PM: dpm_run_callback(): pwm_class_suspend+0x1/0xa8 returns -22
pwm pwmchip4: PM: failed to suspend: error -22
PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected
"
Working case:
"
$ echo 1 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/export
$ echo 100 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/pwm1/period
$ echo 10 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/pwm1/duty_cycle
$ echo mem > /sys/power/state
...
"
Permit unset period in pwm_class_apply_state() in case the PWM is disabled
to fix this issue.
Fixes: ef2bf4997f7d ("pwm: Improve args checking in pwm_apply_state()")
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
---
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/pwm/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 3dacceaef4a9b..87252b70f1c81 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
*/
might_sleep();
- if (!pwm || !state || !state->period ||
- state->duty_cycle > state->period)
+ if (!pwm || !state || (state->enabled &&
+ (!state->period || state->duty_cycle > state->period)))
return -EINVAL;
chip = pwm->chip;
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-11 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-11 18:18 Marek Vasut [this message]
2023-05-11 21:08 ` [PATCH] pwm: core: Permit unset period when applying configuration of disabled PWMs Brian Norris
2023-05-11 23:32 ` Marek Vasut
2023-05-12 0:51 ` Brian Norris
2023-05-12 16:50 ` Marek Vasut
2023-05-12 6:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-05-12 12:20 ` Marek Vasut
2023-05-16 9:42 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230511181853.185685-1-marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).