From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686CCC77B6E for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:28:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229642AbjDMJ25 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2023 05:28:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54000 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229615AbjDMJ24 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2023 05:28:56 -0400 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e5ab]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F106199; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 461686603207; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:28:52 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1681378133; bh=XjK0zXGcRUwWwMF6tZnTtwrjb64IJRzNjt7p/8KBhjs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=d6UgCefhED/N6R8YjSiNAxuQU77pHTuH671k0sortzz+h8HWsWRqZ+jYQSW7fvRuT eyERdIo/mVGeDewj1B8XzdivfyeIBoj4BbuwUO+g6g4nueknODvGQJMPlI4yxePiu7 NuOwzs1nxxvQLZoT6Gz6QqlumXZ/LPPtoRalL/PNZBRzWi21FDr1ERMSzf5/YdQ0ao SuCRTmMDLW4w6pVFA5oYs7uzGfTMJDl8OlQ+a74HPRNcFs/xWKKxq7XUUUEEK9E3RM B6DPGx+OyIBsldxVd+4s/2jbWuEmIGhyaXfSXOHhbMSK51XO+1b02CwJ3aQWBP1d/D z/bAWlEu4eshg== Message-ID: <4a016428-be44-27e3-5bc2-dc517922fa15@collabora.com> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:28:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT6795 Content-Language: en-US To: Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring Cc: p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com, chunkuang.hu@kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, ck.hu@mediatek.com, jitao.shi@mediatek.com, houlong.wei@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com, airlied@gmail.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, kishon@kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, thierry.reding@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com References: <20230412112739.160376-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> <20230412112739.160376-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> <168133318912.3190428.16120880490622098945.robh@kernel.org> <5c0bc1f2-5917-ab84-8b0b-f2adc48f8be7@gmail.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <5c0bc1f2-5917-ab84-8b0b-f2adc48f8be7@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Il 13/04/23 10:52, Matthias Brugger ha scritto: > > > On 12/04/2023 23:03, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:27:13 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >>> Add a compatible string for MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795's display PWM >>> block: this is the same as MT8173. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >>> --- >>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 4 +++- >>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >> >> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the >> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is >> incorrect. These may not be new warnings. >> > > These are not new warnings. I think we should address them in a different patch. In > my opinion it shouldn't block this patch. In the end it only add as compatible here. > I agree. These warnings should not block this patch, as they're totally unrelated to it. Regards, Angelo