Linux-PWM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/2] Add PWM support for Intel Keem Bay SoC
@ 2020-07-18 14:47 vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran @ 2020-07-18 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, robh+dt
  Cc: linux-pwm, devicetree, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad, andriy.shevchenko

From: "Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran" <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>

Hi,

This patch set enables support for PWM on the Intel Keem Bay SoC.
Keem Bay is an ARM based SoC, and the GPIO module allows
configuration of 6 PWM outputs. Patch 1 adds the PWM driver and
Patch 2 is for the required Device Tree bindings documentation.

This driver was tested on the Keem Bay evaluation module board.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Vineetha

Changes since v1:
-Updated licensing info, "clocks" property and example in DT bindings
-Updated name of DT bindings document to match compatible string
-Removed 1 patch for addition of new sysfs attribute "count"
-Added support for COMPILE_TEST in Kconfig
-Updated naming of defines and regmap attribute
-Updated calculation of waveform high time and low time
-Added range checking for waveform high/low time
-Implemented .get_state
-Removed register writes for lead-in and count values (left to default)
-Updated register access to single-access
-Folded keembay_pwm_enable/disable_channel, keembay_pwm_config_period/duty_cycle,
 and keembay_pwm_config into keembay_pwm_apply
-Updated error messages/error codes
-Removed pwm_disable from keembay_pwm_remove
-Removed clk_prepare/clk_enable/clk_disable from driver

Lai, Poey Seng (1):
  pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay

Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran (1):
  dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM

 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml |  45 ++++
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig                                |   9 +
 drivers/pwm/Makefile                               |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c                          | 239 +++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 294 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c

-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
  2020-07-18 14:47 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add PWM support for Intel Keem Bay SoC vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
@ 2020-07-18 14:47 ` vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  2020-07-18 20:41   ` kernel test robot
                     ` (2 more replies)
  2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  1 sibling, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran @ 2020-07-18 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, robh+dt
  Cc: linux-pwm, devicetree, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad, andriy.shevchenko

From: "Lai, Poey Seng" <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>

Enable PWM support for the Intel Keem Bay SoC.

Signed-off-by: Lai, Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig       |   9 ++
 drivers/pwm/Makefile      |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c | 239 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 249 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
index cb8d739..2b0419b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
@@ -569,4 +569,13 @@ config PWM_ZX
 	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
 	  will be called pwm-zx.
 
+config PWM_KEEMBAY
+	tristate "Intel Keem Bay PWM driver"
+	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  The platform driver for Intel Keem Bay PWM controller.
+
+	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+	  will be called pwm-keembay.
+
 endif
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
index a59c710..0c84ff2 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
@@ -55,3 +55,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL)		+= pwm-twl.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL_LED)	+= pwm-twl-led.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_VT8500)	+= pwm-vt8500.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ZX)		+= pwm-zx.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_KEEMBAY)	+= pwm-keembay.o
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fa5fe95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Intel Keem Bay PWM driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation
+ * Authors: Lai Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
+ *          Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+#define KMB_TOTAL_PWM_CHANNELS		6
+#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX		65535
+#define KMB_PWM_EN_BIT			BIT(31)
+
+/* Mask */
+#define KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK		GENMASK(31, 16)
+#define KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK		GENMASK(15, 0)
+#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK		GENMASK(31, 0)
+
+/* PWM Register offset */
+#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET		0x00
+#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN1_OFFSET		0x04
+#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN2_OFFSET		0x08
+#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN3_OFFSET		0x0c
+#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN4_OFFSET		0x10
+#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN5_OFFSET		0x14
+
+#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET		0x20
+#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW1_OFFSET		0x24
+#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW2_OFFSET		0x28
+#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW3_OFFSET		0x2c
+#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW4_OFFSET		0x30
+#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW5_OFFSET		0x34
+
+struct keembay_pwm {
+	struct pwm_chip chip;
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	void __iomem *base;
+};
+
+static inline struct keembay_pwm *to_keembay_pwm_dev(struct pwm_chip *chip)
+{
+	return container_of(chip, struct keembay_pwm, chip);
+}
+
+static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm *priv, u32 mask,
+					   u32 val, u32 reg, int ch)
+{
+	u32 buff, offset, tmp;
+	void __iomem *address;
+
+	offset = reg + ch * 4;
+	address = priv->base + offset;
+	buff = readl(address);
+	tmp = buff & ~mask;
+	tmp |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val);
+	writel(tmp, address);
+}
+
+static void keembay_pwm_enable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch)
+{
+	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 1,
+				KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
+}
+
+static void keembay_pwm_disable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch)
+{
+	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 0,
+				KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
+}
+
+static void keembay_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				  struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
+	unsigned long long pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
+	unsigned long clk_rate;
+	u32 buff;
+
+	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
+
+	/* Read channel enabled status */
+	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET + pwm->hwpwm * 4);
+	if (buff & KMB_PWM_EN_BIT)
+		state->enabled = true;
+	else
+		state->enabled = false;
+
+	/* Read period and duty cycle*/
+	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET + pwm->hwpwm * 4);
+	pwm_l_count = (buff & KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+	pwm_h_count = ((buff & KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK) >> 16) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+	state->duty_cycle = pwm_h_count / clk_rate;
+	state->period = (pwm_h_count + pwm_l_count) / clk_rate;
+}
+
+static int keembay_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			     const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
+	struct pwm_state current_state;
+	u16 pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
+	unsigned long long div;
+	unsigned long clk_rate;
+	u32 pwm_count = 0;
+
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &current_state);
+
+	if (!state->enabled && current_state.enabled) {
+		keembay_pwm_disable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
+		return -ENOSYS;
+
+	/*
+	 * The upper 16 bits of the KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET register contain
+	 * the high time of the waveform, while the last 16 bits contain
+	 * the low time of the waveform, in terms of clock cycles.
+	 *
+	 * high time = clock rate * duty cycle / NSEC_PER_SEC
+	 * low time =  clock rate * (period - duty cycle) / NSEC_PER_SEC
+	 *
+	 * e.g. For period 50000ns, duty cycle 30000ns, and clock rate 500MHz:
+	 * high time = (500000000 * 30000) / 1000000000 = 0x3A98
+	 * low time = (500000000 * 20000) / 1000000000 = 0x2710
+	 * Value written to KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET = 0x3A982710
+	 */
+
+	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
+
+	/* Configure waveform high time */
+	div = clk_rate * state->duty_cycle;
+	do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+	if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
+		return -ERANGE;
+
+	pwm_h_count = (u16)div;
+
+	/* Configure waveform low time */
+	div = clk_rate * (state->period - state->duty_cycle);
+	do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+	if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
+		return -ERANGE;
+
+	pwm_l_count = (u16)div;
+
+	pwm_count |= pwm_h_count << 16;
+	pwm_count |= pwm_l_count;
+
+	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK,
+				pwm_count, KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET, pwm->hwpwm);
+
+	if (state->enabled && !current_state.enabled)
+		keembay_pwm_enable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops keembay_pwm_ops = {
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.apply = keembay_pwm_apply,
+	.get_state = keembay_pwm_get_state,
+};
+
+static int keembay_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct keembay_pwm *priv;
+	int ret;
+
+	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!priv)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
+		if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock: %pe", priv->clk);
+
+		return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
+	}
+
+	priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
+		return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
+
+	priv->chip.base = -1;
+	priv->chip.dev = dev;
+	priv->chip.ops = &keembay_pwm_ops;
+	priv->chip.npwm = KMB_TOTAL_PWM_CHANNELS;
+
+	ret = pwmchip_add(&priv->chip);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add PWM chip: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int keembay_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct keembay_pwm *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	return pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id keembay_pwm_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "intel,keembay-pwm" },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, keembay_pwm_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver keembay_pwm_driver = {
+	.probe	= keembay_pwm_probe,
+	.remove	= keembay_pwm_remove,
+	.driver	= {
+		.name = "pwm-keembay",
+		.of_match_table = keembay_pwm_of_match,
+	},
+};
+module_platform_driver(keembay_pwm_driver);
+
+MODULE_ALIAS("platform:keembay");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Keem Bay PWM driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM
  2020-07-18 14:47 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add PWM support for Intel Keem Bay SoC vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
@ 2020-07-18 14:47 ` vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  2020-07-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran @ 2020-07-18 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, robh+dt
  Cc: linux-pwm, devicetree, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad, andriy.shevchenko

From: "Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran" <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>

Add PWM Device Tree bindings documentation for the Intel Keem Bay SoC.

Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e9388a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Intel Keem Bay PWM Device Tree Bindings
+
+maintainers:
+  - Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: pwm.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    enum:
+      - intel,keembay-pwm
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  "#pwm-cells":
+    const: 2
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - clocks
+ - '#pwm-cells'
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #define KEEM_BAY_A53_GPIO
+
+    pwm@203200a0 {
+      compatible = "intel,keembay-pwm";
+      reg = <0x203200a0 0xe8>;
+      clocks = <&scmi_clk KEEM_BAY_A53_GPIO>;
+      #pwm-cells = <2>;
+    };
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
  2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
@ 2020-07-18 20:41   ` kernel test robot
  2020-07-18 21:17   ` kernel test robot
  2020-07-21  9:13   ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-07-18 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran, thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, robh+dt
  Cc: kbuild-all, linux-pwm, devicetree, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad,
	andriy.shevchenko


[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1388 bytes --]

Hi,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on pwm/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on robh/for-next v5.8-rc5 next-20200717]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/vineetha-g-jaya-kumaran-intel-com/Add-PWM-support-for-Intel-Keem-Bay-SoC/20200718-225115
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm.git for-next
config: m68k-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   m68k-linux-ld: drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.o: in function `keembay_pwm_get_state':
>> pwm-keembay.c:(.text+0x8a): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 57523 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
  2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  2020-07-18 20:41   ` kernel test robot
@ 2020-07-18 21:17   ` kernel test robot
  2020-07-21  9:13   ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-07-18 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran, thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, robh+dt
  Cc: kbuild-all, linux-pwm, devicetree, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad,
	andriy.shevchenko


[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1406 bytes --]

Hi,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on pwm/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on robh/for-next v5.8-rc5 next-20200717]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/vineetha-g-jaya-kumaran-intel-com/Add-PWM-support-for-Intel-Keem-Bay-SoC/20200718-225115
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm.git for-next
config: m68k-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):

>> ERROR: modpost: "__divdi3" [drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: modpost: "__udivdi3" [drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.ko] undefined!

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 57215 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
  2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  2020-07-18 20:41   ` kernel test robot
  2020-07-18 21:17   ` kernel test robot
@ 2020-07-21  9:13   ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2020-07-27  5:12     ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2020-07-21  9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  Cc: thierry.reding, robh+dt, linux-pwm, devicetree,
	wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad, andriy.shevchenko


[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9169 bytes --]

Hello,

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:47:07PM +0800, vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com wrote:
> From: "Lai, Poey Seng" <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
> 
> Enable PWM support for the Intel Keem Bay SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai, Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/Kconfig       |   9 ++
>  drivers/pwm/Makefile      |   1 +
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c | 239 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 249 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> index cb8d739..2b0419b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -569,4 +569,13 @@ config PWM_ZX
>  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
>  	  will be called pwm-zx.
>  
> +config PWM_KEEMBAY
> +	tristate "Intel Keem Bay PWM driver"
> +	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> +	help
> +	  The platform driver for Intel Keem Bay PWM controller.
> +
> +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> +	  will be called pwm-keembay.
> +
>  endif
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> index a59c710..0c84ff2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> @@ -55,3 +55,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL)		+= pwm-twl.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL_LED)	+= pwm-twl-led.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_VT8500)	+= pwm-vt8500.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ZX)		+= pwm-zx.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_KEEMBAY)	+= pwm-keembay.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..fa5fe95
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Intel Keem Bay PWM driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation
> + * Authors: Lai Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
> + *          Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> + */

If possible, please add a link here to documentation for this chip.

> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +#define KMB_TOTAL_PWM_CHANNELS		6
> +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX		65535

If you write this as hexadecimal constant it is more obvious.

> +#define KMB_PWM_EN_BIT			BIT(31)
> +
> +/* Mask */
> +#define KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK		GENMASK(31, 16)
> +#define KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK		GENMASK(31, 0)
> +
> +/* PWM Register offset */
> +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET		0x00
> +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN1_OFFSET		0x04
> +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN2_OFFSET		0x08
> +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN3_OFFSET		0x0c
> +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN4_OFFSET		0x10
> +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN5_OFFSET		0x14

All but ..LEADIN0.. are unused. Is this maybe more useful to write as:

	#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(ch)	(0x00 + 4 * (ch))

?

> +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET		0x20
> +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW1_OFFSET		0x24
> +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW2_OFFSET		0x28
> +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW3_OFFSET		0x2c
> +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW4_OFFSET		0x30
> +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW5_OFFSET		0x34

ditto.

> +struct keembay_pwm {
> +	struct pwm_chip chip;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct clk *clk;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct keembay_pwm *to_keembay_pwm_dev(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	return container_of(chip, struct keembay_pwm, chip);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm *priv, u32 mask,
> +					   u32 val, u32 reg, int ch)
> +{
> +	u32 buff, offset, tmp;
> +	void __iomem *address;
> +
> +	offset = reg + ch * 4;
> +	address = priv->base + offset;
> +	buff = readl(address);
> +	tmp = buff & ~mask;
> +	tmp |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val);
> +	writel(tmp, address);
> +}
> +
> +static void keembay_pwm_enable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch)
> +{
> +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 1,
> +				KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
> +}
> +
> +static void keembay_pwm_disable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch)
> +{
> +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 0,
> +				KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
> +}
> +
> +static void keembay_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				  struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> +	unsigned long long pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> +	u32 buff;
> +
> +	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> +
> +	/* Read channel enabled status */
> +	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET + pwm->hwpwm * 4);
> +	if (buff & KMB_PWM_EN_BIT)
> +		state->enabled = true;
> +	else
> +		state->enabled = false;
> +
> +	/* Read period and duty cycle*/

Missing ' ' before closing */

> +	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET + pwm->hwpwm * 4);
> +	pwm_l_count = (buff & KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> +	pwm_h_count = ((buff & KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK) >> 16) * NSEC_PER_SEC;

pwm_h_count = FIELD_GET(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, buff) * NSEC_PER_SEC

> +	state->duty_cycle = pwm_h_count / clk_rate;
> +	state->period = (pwm_h_count + pwm_l_count) / clk_rate;

Please round up both values.

> +}
> +
> +static int keembay_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +			     const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> +	struct pwm_state current_state;
> +	u16 pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> +	unsigned long long div;
> +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> +	u32 pwm_count = 0;
> +
> +	pwm_get_state(pwm, &current_state);

Please check the hardware state, not the value cached in the PWM
framework.

> +	if (!state->enabled && current_state.enabled) {
> +		keembay_pwm_disable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> +		return -ENOSYS;

This must be checked before .enabled. That's because the expectation on

	.enabled = false
	.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED

is that the output gets constant high.

> +	/*
> +	 * The upper 16 bits of the KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET register contain
> +	 * the high time of the waveform, while the last 16 bits contain
> +	 * the low time of the waveform, in terms of clock cycles.

Just to be sure: Each period starts with the high time, right?

> +	 * high time = clock rate * duty cycle / NSEC_PER_SEC
> +	 * low time =  clock rate * (period - duty cycle) / NSEC_PER_SEC
> +	 *
> +	 * e.g. For period 50000ns, duty cycle 30000ns, and clock rate 500MHz:
> +	 * high time = (500000000 * 30000) / 1000000000 = 0x3A98
> +	 * low time = (500000000 * 20000) / 1000000000 = 0x2710
> +	 * Value written to KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET = 0x3A982710

For period = 50000ns, duty_cycle = 30000ns and clock rate 266666666 Hz you
have to configure:

	high = 7999
	low = 5334

> +	 */
> +
> +	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> +
> +	/* Configure waveform high time */
> +	div = clk_rate * state->duty_cycle;
> +	do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);

Can this overflow?

> +	if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
> +		return -ERANGE;
> +
> +	pwm_h_count = (u16)div;

No need for this cast.

> +	/* Configure waveform low time */
> +	div = clk_rate * (state->period - state->duty_cycle);
> +	do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);

Here the rounding is wrong. (See above example, currently you use
low = 5333 here)

> +	if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
> +		return -ERANGE;
> +
> +	pwm_l_count = (u16)div;
> +
> +	pwm_count |= pwm_h_count << 16;
> +	pwm_count |= pwm_l_count;

pwm_count = FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, pwm_h_count) | FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK, pwm_l_count);

> +
> +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK,
> +				pwm_count, KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET, pwm->hwpwm);

here the rwm-procedure is not necessary as all 32 bits are written
anyhow.

> +	if (state->enabled && !current_state.enabled)
> +		keembay_pwm_enable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> [...]
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:keembay");

This has to match your driver's name, so use:

	MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pwm-keembay");
	
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Keem Bay PWM driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

In v1 you told that on reconfiguration the hardware completes the
currently running period. Please document this in the driver, similar to
e.g. pwm-sifive.c.

You only ever write the enable bit in the leadin register. If there is
something != 0 at boot this influences the correct behaviour of the
driver, right?

Further things to note there:

 - What is the behaviour on disable (usual candidates: freezes at
   current value, completes period and emits low, changes to High-Z)?

 - Can it do 0% and 100% duty ratio?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM
  2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
@ 2020-07-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
  2020-07-27  5:14     ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2020-07-23 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
  Cc: thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, linux-pwm, devicetree,
	wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad, andriy.shevchenko

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:47:08PM +0800, vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com wrote:
> From: "Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran" <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> 
> Add PWM Device Tree bindings documentation for the Intel Keem Bay SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..e9388a7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +# Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Intel Keem Bay PWM Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: pwm.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - intel,keembay-pwm
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  "#pwm-cells":
> +    const: 2
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - clocks
> + - '#pwm-cells'

Add:

additionalProperties: false

With that,

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #define KEEM_BAY_A53_GPIO
> +
> +    pwm@203200a0 {
> +      compatible = "intel,keembay-pwm";
> +      reg = <0x203200a0 0xe8>;
> +      clocks = <&scmi_clk KEEM_BAY_A53_GPIO>;
> +      #pwm-cells = <2>;
> +    };
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
  2020-07-21  9:13   ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2020-07-27  5:12     ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
  2020-07-29  6:20       ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha @ 2020-07-27  5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine Konig
  Cc: thierry.reding, robh+dt, linux-pwm, devicetree, Wan Mohamad,
	Wan Ahmad Zainie, Shevchenko, Andriy

Hi Uwe,

Thank you for the feedback, will work on the changes for V3.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-pwm-
> owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Uwe Kleine-König
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 5:14 PM
> To: G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; linux-
> pwm@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Wan Mohamad, Wan
> Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>; Shevchenko,
> Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:47:07PM +0800,
> vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com wrote:
> > From: "Lai, Poey Seng" <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
> >
> > Enable PWM support for the Intel Keem Bay SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lai, Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran
> > <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/Kconfig       |   9 ++
> >  drivers/pwm/Makefile      |   1 +
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c | 239
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 249 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig index
> > cb8d739..2b0419b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> > @@ -569,4 +569,13 @@ config PWM_ZX
> >  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> >  	  will be called pwm-zx.
> >
> > +config PWM_KEEMBAY
> > +	tristate "Intel Keem Bay PWM driver"
> > +	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> > +	help
> > +	  The platform driver for Intel Keem Bay PWM controller.
> > +
> > +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> > +	  will be called pwm-keembay.
> > +
> >  endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile index
> > a59c710..0c84ff2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> > @@ -55,3 +55,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL)		+= pwm-twl.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL_LED)	+= pwm-twl-led.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_VT8500)	+= pwm-vt8500.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ZX)		+= pwm-zx.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_KEEMBAY)	+= pwm-keembay.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> new
> > file mode 100644 index 00000000..fa5fe95
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Intel Keem Bay PWM driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation
> > + * Authors: Lai Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
> > + *          Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> > + */
> 
> If possible, please add a link here to documentation for this chip.
> 

There is no documentation released publicly (yet), but once there is, I will add it in.

> > +
> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +
> > +#define KMB_TOTAL_PWM_CHANNELS		6
> > +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX		65535
> 
> If you write this as hexadecimal constant it is more obvious.
> 
> > +#define KMB_PWM_EN_BIT			BIT(31)
> > +
> > +/* Mask */
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK		GENMASK(31, 16)
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK		GENMASK(15, 0)
> > +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK		GENMASK(31, 0)
> > +
> > +/* PWM Register offset */
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET		0x00
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN1_OFFSET		0x04
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN2_OFFSET		0x08
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN3_OFFSET		0x0c
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN4_OFFSET		0x10
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN5_OFFSET		0x14
> 
> All but ..LEADIN0.. are unused. Is this maybe more useful to write as:
> 
> 	#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(ch)	(0x00 + 4 * (ch))
> 
> ?
> 

Agreed, will change this for both KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET and KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET.

> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET		0x20
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW1_OFFSET		0x24
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW2_OFFSET		0x28
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW3_OFFSET		0x2c
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW4_OFFSET		0x30
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW5_OFFSET		0x34
> 
> ditto.
> 
> > +struct keembay_pwm {
> > +	struct pwm_chip chip;
> > +	struct device *dev;
> > +	struct clk *clk;
> > +	void __iomem *base;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline struct keembay_pwm *to_keembay_pwm_dev(struct
> pwm_chip
> > +*chip) {
> > +	return container_of(chip, struct keembay_pwm, chip); }
> > +
> > +static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm
> *priv, u32 mask,
> > +					   u32 val, u32 reg, int ch)
> > +{
> > +	u32 buff, offset, tmp;
> > +	void __iomem *address;
> > +
> > +	offset = reg + ch * 4;
> > +	address = priv->base + offset;
> > +	buff = readl(address);
> > +	tmp = buff & ~mask;
> > +	tmp |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val);
> > +	writel(tmp, address);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void keembay_pwm_enable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch) {
> > +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 1,
> > +				KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void keembay_pwm_disable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch) {
> > +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 0,
> > +				KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void keembay_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> pwm_device *pwm,
> > +				  struct pwm_state *state)
> > +{
> > +	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> > +	unsigned long long pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> > +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> > +	u32 buff;
> > +
> > +	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> > +
> > +	/* Read channel enabled status */
> > +	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET + pwm-
> >hwpwm * 4);
> > +	if (buff & KMB_PWM_EN_BIT)
> > +		state->enabled = true;
> > +	else
> > +		state->enabled = false;
> > +
> > +	/* Read period and duty cycle*/
> 
> Missing ' ' before closing */
> 
> > +	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET + pwm-
> >hwpwm * 4);
> > +	pwm_l_count = (buff & KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> > +	pwm_h_count = ((buff & KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK) >> 16) *
> NSEC_PER_SEC;
> 
> pwm_h_count = FIELD_GET(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, buff) *
> NSEC_PER_SEC
> 
> > +	state->duty_cycle = pwm_h_count / clk_rate;
> > +	state->period = (pwm_h_count + pwm_l_count) / clk_rate;
> 
> Please round up both values.
> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> pwm_device *pwm,
> > +			     const struct pwm_state *state) {
> > +	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> > +	struct pwm_state current_state;
> > +	u16 pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> > +	unsigned long long div;
> > +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> > +	u32 pwm_count = 0;
> > +
> > +	pwm_get_state(pwm, &current_state);
> 
> Please check the hardware state, not the value cached in the PWM
> framework.
> 
> > +	if (!state->enabled && current_state.enabled) {
> > +		keembay_pwm_disable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> > +		return -ENOSYS;
> 
> This must be checked before .enabled. That's because the expectation on
> 
> 	.enabled = false
> 	.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED
> 
> is that the output gets constant high.
> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The upper 16 bits of the KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET register
> contain
> > +	 * the high time of the waveform, while the last 16 bits contain
> > +	 * the low time of the waveform, in terms of clock cycles.
> 
> Just to be sure: Each period starts with the high time, right?
> 

Yes, each period starts with the high time.

> > +	 * high time = clock rate * duty cycle / NSEC_PER_SEC
> > +	 * low time =  clock rate * (period - duty cycle) / NSEC_PER_SEC
> > +	 *
> > +	 * e.g. For period 50000ns, duty cycle 30000ns, and clock rate 500MHz:
> > +	 * high time = (500000000 * 30000) / 1000000000 = 0x3A98
> > +	 * low time = (500000000 * 20000) / 1000000000 = 0x2710
> > +	 * Value written to KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET = 0x3A982710
> 
> For period = 50000ns, duty_cycle = 30000ns and clock rate 266666666 Hz you
> have to configure:
> 
> 	high = 7999
> 	low = 5334
> 
> > +	 */
> > +
> > +	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> > +
> > +	/* Configure waveform high time */
> > +	div = clk_rate * state->duty_cycle;
> > +	do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> 
> Can this overflow?
> 
> > +	if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
> > +		return -ERANGE;
> > +
> > +	pwm_h_count = (u16)div;
> 
> No need for this cast.
> 
> > +	/* Configure waveform low time */
> > +	div = clk_rate * (state->period - state->duty_cycle);
> > +	do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> 
> Here the rounding is wrong. (See above example, currently you use low =
> 5333 here)
> 
> > +	if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
> > +		return -ERANGE;
> > +
> > +	pwm_l_count = (u16)div;
> > +
> > +	pwm_count |= pwm_h_count << 16;
> > +	pwm_count |= pwm_l_count;
> 
> pwm_count = FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, pwm_h_count) |
> FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK, pwm_l_count);
> 
> > +
> > +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK,
> > +				pwm_count,
> KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET, pwm->hwpwm);
> 
> here the rwm-procedure is not necessary as all 32 bits are written anyhow.
> 
> > +	if (state->enabled && !current_state.enabled)
> > +		keembay_pwm_enable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > [...]
> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:keembay");
> 
> This has to match your driver's name, so use:
> 
> 	MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pwm-keembay");
> 
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Keem Bay PWM driver");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL
> > +v2");
> 
> In v1 you told that on reconfiguration the hardware completes the currently
> running period. Please document this in the driver, similar to e.g. pwm-
> sifive.c.
> 

OK, I will refer to that example and add this information in.

> You only ever write the enable bit in the leadin register. If there is something
> != 0 at boot this influences the correct behaviour of the driver, right?
> 

That's right, I will add a check during probe to ensure the bit is set to 0 as default.

> Further things to note there:
> 
>  - What is the behaviour on disable (usual candidates: freezes at
>    current value, completes period and emits low, changes to High-Z)?
> 

For this case, the period does not get completed.
As soon as the channel is disabled, the output goes low.

>  - Can it do 0% and 100% duty ratio?
> 

Yes, we can set duty cycles of 0% and 100%.

> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM
  2020-07-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
@ 2020-07-27  5:14     ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha @ 2020-07-27  5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig, linux-pwm, devicetree,
	Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie, Shevchenko, Andriy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 1:47 AM
> To: G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com; u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de; linux-
> pwm@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Wan Mohamad, Wan
> Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>; Shevchenko,
> Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for
> Intel Keem Bay PWM
> 
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:47:08PM +0800,
> vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com wrote:
> > From: "Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran" <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> >
> > Add PWM Device Tree bindings documentation for the Intel Keem Bay SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran
> > <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml | 45
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..e9388a7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/intel,keembay-
> pwm.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) # Copyright
> > +(C) 2020 Intel Corporation %YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/intel,keembay-pwm.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Intel Keem Bay PWM Device Tree Bindings
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: pwm.yaml#
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - intel,keembay-pwm
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  "#pwm-cells":
> > +    const: 2
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - clocks
> > + - '#pwm-cells'
> 
> Add:
> 
> additionalProperties: false
> 
> With that,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> 

Thank you for reviewing, I will add this in V3.

> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #define KEEM_BAY_A53_GPIO
> > +
> > +    pwm@203200a0 {
> > +      compatible = "intel,keembay-pwm";
> > +      reg = <0x203200a0 0xe8>;
> > +      clocks = <&scmi_clk KEEM_BAY_A53_GPIO>;
> > +      #pwm-cells = <2>;
> > +    };
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
  2020-07-27  5:12     ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
@ 2020-07-29  6:20       ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha @ 2020-07-29  6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine Konig
  Cc: thierry.reding, robh+dt, linux-pwm, devicetree, Wan Mohamad,
	Wan Ahmad Zainie, Shevchenko, Andriy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-pwm-
> owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 1:12 PM
> To: Uwe Kleine Konig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; linux-
> pwm@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Wan Mohamad, Wan
> Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>; Shevchenko,
> Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
> 
> Hi Uwe,
> 
> Thank you for the feedback, will work on the changes for V3.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-pwm-
> > owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Uwe Kleine-König
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 5:14 PM
> > To: G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> > Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; linux-
> > pwm@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Wan Mohamad, Wan
> > Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>;
> Shevchenko,
> > Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:47:07PM +0800,
> > vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: "Lai, Poey Seng" <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Enable PWM support for the Intel Keem Bay SoC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lai, Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran
> > > <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pwm/Kconfig       |   9 ++
> > >  drivers/pwm/Makefile      |   1 +
> > >  drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c | 239
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 249 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig index
> > > cb8d739..2b0419b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> > > @@ -569,4 +569,13 @@ config PWM_ZX
> > >  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> > >  	  will be called pwm-zx.
> > >
> > > +config PWM_KEEMBAY
> > > +	tristate "Intel Keem Bay PWM driver"
> > > +	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> > > +	help
> > > +	  The platform driver for Intel Keem Bay PWM controller.
> > > +
> > > +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> > > +	  will be called pwm-keembay.
> > > +
> > >  endif
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile index
> > > a59c710..0c84ff2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> > > @@ -55,3 +55,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL)		+= pwm-twl.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL_LED)	+= pwm-twl-led.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_VT8500)	+= pwm-vt8500.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ZX)		+= pwm-zx.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_KEEMBAY)	+= pwm-keembay.o
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-
> keembay.c
> > new
> > > file mode 100644 index 00000000..fa5fe95
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/*
> > > + * Intel Keem Bay PWM driver
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation
> > > + * Authors: Lai Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@intel.com>
> > > + *          Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran
> <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@intel.com>
> > > + */
> >
> > If possible, please add a link here to documentation for this chip.
> >
> 
> There is no documentation released publicly (yet), but once there is, I will
> add it in.
> 
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> > > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define KMB_TOTAL_PWM_CHANNELS		6
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX		65535
> >
> > If you write this as hexadecimal constant it is more obvious.
> >
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_EN_BIT			BIT(31)
> > > +
> > > +/* Mask */
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK		GENMASK(31, 16)
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK		GENMASK(15, 0)
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK		GENMASK(31, 0)
> > > +
> > > +/* PWM Register offset */
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET		0x00
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN1_OFFSET		0x04
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN2_OFFSET		0x08
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN3_OFFSET		0x0c
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN4_OFFSET		0x10
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN5_OFFSET		0x14
> >
> > All but ..LEADIN0.. are unused. Is this maybe more useful to write as:
> >
> > 	#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(ch)	(0x00 + 4 * (ch))
> >
> > ?
> >
> 
> Agreed, will change this for both KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET and
> KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET.
> 
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET		0x20
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW1_OFFSET		0x24
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW2_OFFSET		0x28
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW3_OFFSET		0x2c
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW4_OFFSET		0x30
> > > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW5_OFFSET		0x34
> >
> > ditto.
> >
> > > +struct keembay_pwm {
> > > +	struct pwm_chip chip;
> > > +	struct device *dev;
> > > +	struct clk *clk;
> > > +	void __iomem *base;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static inline struct keembay_pwm *to_keembay_pwm_dev(struct
> > pwm_chip
> > > +*chip) {
> > > +	return container_of(chip, struct keembay_pwm, chip); }
> > > +
> > > +static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm
> > *priv, u32 mask,
> > > +					   u32 val, u32 reg, int ch)
> > > +{
> > > +	u32 buff, offset, tmp;
> > > +	void __iomem *address;
> > > +
> > > +	offset = reg + ch * 4;
> > > +	address = priv->base + offset;
> > > +	buff = readl(address);
> > > +	tmp = buff & ~mask;
> > > +	tmp |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val);
> > > +	writel(tmp, address);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void keembay_pwm_enable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch) {
> > > +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 1,
> > > +				KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void keembay_pwm_disable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch) {
> > > +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 0,
> > > +				KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void keembay_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> > pwm_device *pwm,
> > > +				  struct pwm_state *state)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> > > +	unsigned long long pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> > > +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> > > +	u32 buff;
> > > +
> > > +	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> > > +
> > > +	/* Read channel enabled status */
> > > +	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET + pwm-
> > >hwpwm * 4);
> > > +	if (buff & KMB_PWM_EN_BIT)
> > > +		state->enabled = true;
> > > +	else
> > > +		state->enabled = false;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Read period and duty cycle*/
> >
> > Missing ' ' before closing */
> >
> > > +	buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET + pwm-
> > >hwpwm * 4);
> > > +	pwm_l_count = (buff & KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> > > +	pwm_h_count = ((buff & KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK) >> 16) *
> > NSEC_PER_SEC;
> >
> > pwm_h_count = FIELD_GET(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, buff) *
> NSEC_PER_SEC
> >
> > > +	state->duty_cycle = pwm_h_count / clk_rate;
> > > +	state->period = (pwm_h_count + pwm_l_count) / clk_rate;
> >
> > Please round up both values.
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int keembay_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> > pwm_device *pwm,
> > > +			     const struct pwm_state *state) {
> > > +	struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> > > +	struct pwm_state current_state;
> > > +	u16 pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> > > +	unsigned long long div;
> > > +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> > > +	u32 pwm_count = 0;
> > > +
> > > +	pwm_get_state(pwm, &current_state);
> >
> > Please check the hardware state, not the value cached in the PWM
> > framework.
> >
> > > +	if (!state->enabled && current_state.enabled) {
> > > +		keembay_pwm_disable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> > > +		return -ENOSYS;
> >
> > This must be checked before .enabled. That's because the expectation
> > on
> >
> > 	.enabled = false
> > 	.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED
> >
> > is that the output gets constant high.
> >
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * The upper 16 bits of the KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET register
> > contain
> > > +	 * the high time of the waveform, while the last 16 bits contain
> > > +	 * the low time of the waveform, in terms of clock cycles.
> >
> > Just to be sure: Each period starts with the high time, right?
> >
> 
> Yes, each period starts with the high time.
> 
> > > +	 * high time = clock rate * duty cycle / NSEC_PER_SEC
> > > +	 * low time =  clock rate * (period - duty cycle) / NSEC_PER_SEC
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * e.g. For period 50000ns, duty cycle 30000ns, and clock rate 500MHz:
> > > +	 * high time = (500000000 * 30000) / 1000000000 = 0x3A98
> > > +	 * low time = (500000000 * 20000) / 1000000000 = 0x2710
> > > +	 * Value written to KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET = 0x3A982710
> >
> > For period = 50000ns, duty_cycle = 30000ns and clock rate 266666666 Hz
> > you have to configure:
> >
> > 	high = 7999
> > 	low = 5334
> >
> > > +	 */
> > > +
> > > +	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> > > +
> > > +	/* Configure waveform high time */
> > > +	div = clk_rate * state->duty_cycle;
> > > +	do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> >
> > Can this overflow?
> >

Hi Uwe, sorry for missing this in my previous reply.
Yes, it may exceed the 16-bit limit for the high/low time, depending on the selected duty cycle.
There is a range check after, and -ERANGE will be returned if the high/low time range is exceeded.

> > > +	if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
> > > +		return -ERANGE;
> > > +
> > > +	pwm_h_count = (u16)div;
> >
> > No need for this cast.
> >
> > > +	/* Configure waveform low time */
> > > +	div = clk_rate * (state->period - state->duty_cycle);
> > > +	do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> >
> > Here the rounding is wrong. (See above example, currently you use low
> > =
> > 5333 here)
> >

Will fix the rounding to the nearest integer for the high/low time.

> > > +	if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
> > > +		return -ERANGE;
> > > +
> > > +	pwm_l_count = (u16)div;
> > > +
> > > +	pwm_count |= pwm_h_count << 16;
> > > +	pwm_count |= pwm_l_count;
> >
> > pwm_count = FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, pwm_h_count) |
> > FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK, pwm_l_count);
> >
> > > +
> > > +	keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK,
> > > +				pwm_count,
> > KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET, pwm->hwpwm);
> >
> > here the rwm-procedure is not necessary as all 32 bits are written anyhow.
> >
> > > +	if (state->enabled && !current_state.enabled)
> > > +		keembay_pwm_enable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > [...]
> > > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:keembay");
> >
> > This has to match your driver's name, so use:
> >
> > 	MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pwm-keembay");
> >
> > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Keem Bay PWM driver");
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL
> > > +v2");
> >
> > In v1 you told that on reconfiguration the hardware completes the
> > currently running period. Please document this in the driver, similar
> > to e.g. pwm- sifive.c.
> >
> 
> OK, I will refer to that example and add this information in.
> 
> > You only ever write the enable bit in the leadin register. If there is
> > something != 0 at boot this influences the correct behaviour of the driver,
> right?
> >
> 
> That's right, I will add a check during probe to ensure the bit is set to 0 as
> default.
> 
> > Further things to note there:
> >
> >  - What is the behaviour on disable (usual candidates: freezes at
> >    current value, completes period and emits low, changes to High-Z)?
> >
> 
> For this case, the period does not get completed.
> As soon as the channel is disabled, the output goes low.
> 
> >  - Can it do 0% and 100% duty ratio?
> >
> 
> Yes, we can set duty cycles of 0% and 100%.
> 
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> >
> > --
> > Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> > Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-18 14:47 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add PWM support for Intel Keem Bay SoC vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
2020-07-18 20:41   ` kernel test robot
2020-07-18 21:17   ` kernel test robot
2020-07-21  9:13   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-27  5:12     ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
2020-07-29  6:20       ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha
2020-07-18 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: pwm: keembay: Add bindings for Intel Keem Bay PWM vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran
2020-07-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
2020-07-27  5:14     ` G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha

Linux-PWM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/0 linux-pwm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pwm linux-pwm/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm \
		linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-pwm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pwm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git