On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 01:37:13AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 19.08.2021 20:03, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:27:40AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> The SDHCI on Tegra belongs to the core power domain and we're going to
> >> enable GENPD support for the core domain. Now SDHCI must be resumed using
> >> runtime PM API in order to initialize the SDHCI power state. The SDHCI
> >> clock rate must be changed using OPP API that will reconfigure the power
> >> domain performance state in accordance to the rate. Add runtime PM and OPP
> >> support to the SDHCI driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>  1 file changed, 105 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
> >> index 387ce9cdbd7c..a3583359c972 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
> >> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> >>  #include <linux/of.h>
> >>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >>  #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> >> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> >> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >>  #include <linux/reset.h>
> >>  #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
> >> @@ -24,6 +26,8 @@
> >>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> >>  #include <linux/ktime.h>
> >>  
> >> +#include <soc/tegra/common.h>
> >> +
> >>  #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
> >>  #include "cqhci.h"
> >>  
> >> @@ -123,6 +127,12 @@
> >>  					 SDHCI_TRNS_BLK_CNT_EN | \
> >>  					 SDHCI_TRNS_DMA)
> >>  
> >> +enum {
> >> +	TEGRA_CLK_BULK_SDHCI,
> >> +	TEGRA_CLK_BULK_TMCLK,
> >> +	TEGRA_CLK_BULK_NUM,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data {
> >>  	const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pdata;
> >>  	u64 dma_mask;
> >> @@ -171,6 +181,8 @@ struct sdhci_tegra {
> >>  	bool enable_hwcq;
> >>  	unsigned long curr_clk_rate;
> >>  	u8 tuned_tap_delay;
> >> +
> >> +	struct clk_bulk_data clocks[TEGRA_CLK_BULK_NUM];
> > 
> > This doesn't seem worth it to me. There's a lot of churn in this driver
> > that's only needed to convert this to the clk_bulk API and it makes the
> > code a lot more difficult to read, in my opinion.
> > 
> > It looks like the only benefit that this gives us is that runtime
> > suspend and resume become a few lines shorter.
> 
> The driver probe code looks cleaner with that. You should be looking at
> the final result and not at the patch to see it.

I did look at the final result and didn't find it cleaner at all. =)

Thierry