linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "heming.zhao@suse.com" <heming.zhao@suse.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
	guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com, xni@redhat.com
Cc: lidong.zhong@suse.com, neilb@suse.de, colyli@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] md/cluster: fix deadlock when doing reshape job
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:39:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <864282f2-4924-2cc3-9c9f-4e0ac1888bf5@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1605414622-26025-3-git-send-email-heming.zhao@suse.com>

On 11/15/20 12:30 PM, Zhao Heming wrote:
> ... ...
> How to fix:
> 
> Use the same way of metadata_update_start. lock_comm &
> metadata_update_start are two equal users that want to get token lock.
> lock_comm could do the same steps like metadata_update_start.
> The patch moves setting MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD from
> lock_token to lock_comm. It enlarge a little bit window of
> MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD, but it is safe & can break deadlock
> perfectly.
> 
> At last, thanks for Xiao's solution.
> 
> 

for easy review, I paste key fix code from v3 patch.

legacy code (original upstream code):

```
static int lock_token(struct md_cluster_info *cinfo, bool mddev_locked)
{
    int error, set_bit = 0;
    struct mddev *mddev = cinfo->mddev;

    /*
     * If resync thread run after raid1d thread, then process_metadata_update
     * could not continue if raid1d held reconfig_mutex (and raid1d is blocked
     * since another node already got EX on Token and waitting the EX of Ack),
     * so let resync wake up thread in case flag is set.
     */
    if (mddev_locked && !test_bit(MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD,
                      &cinfo->state)) {
        error = test_and_set_bit_lock(MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD,
                          &cinfo->state);
        WARN_ON_ONCE(error);
        md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
        set_bit = 1;
    }
    error = dlm_lock_sync(cinfo->token_lockres, DLM_LOCK_EX);
    if (set_bit)
        clear_bit_unlock(MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD, &cinfo->state);

    if (error)
        pr_err("md-cluster(%s:%d): failed to get EX on TOKEN (%d)\n",
                __func__, __LINE__, error);

    /* Lock the receive sequence */
    mutex_lock(&cinfo->recv_mutex);
    return error;
}

/* lock_comm()
 * Sets the MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK bit to lock the send channel.
 */
static int lock_comm(struct md_cluster_info *cinfo, bool mddev_locked)
{
    wait_event(cinfo->wait,
           !test_and_set_bit(MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK, &cinfo->state));

    return lock_token(cinfo, mddev_locked);
}
```

v3 patch:
```
static int lock_token(struct md_cluster_info *cinfo)
{
    int error;

    error = dlm_lock_sync(cinfo->token_lockres, DLM_LOCK_EX);
    if (error) {
        pr_err("md-cluster(%s:%d): failed to get EX on TOKEN (%d)\n",
                __func__, __LINE__, error);
    } else {
        /* Lock the receive sequence */
        mutex_lock(&cinfo->recv_mutex);
    }
    return error;
}

/* lock_comm()
 * Sets the MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK bit to lock the send channel.
 */
static int lock_comm(struct md_cluster_info *cinfo, bool mddev_locked)
{
    int rv, set_bit = 0;
    struct mddev *mddev = cinfo->mddev;

    /*
     * If resync thread run after raid1d thread, then process_metadata_update
     * could not continue if raid1d held reconfig_mutex (and raid1d is blocked
     * since another node already got EX on Token and waitting the EX of Ack),
     * so let resync wake up thread in case flag is set.
     */
    if (mddev_locked && !test_bit(MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD,
                      &cinfo->state)) {
        rv = test_and_set_bit_lock(MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD,
                          &cinfo->state);
        WARN_ON_ONCE(rv);
        md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
        set_bit = 1;
    }

    wait_event(cinfo->wait,
               !test_and_set_bit(MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK, &cinfo->state));
    rv = lock_token(cinfo);
    if (set_bit)
        clear_bit_unlock(MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD, &cinfo->state);
    return rv;
}
```


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-15  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-15  4:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] md/cluster bugs fix Zhao Heming
2020-11-15  4:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] md/cluster: reshape should returns error when remote doing resyncing job Zhao Heming
2020-11-16  9:05   ` Song Liu
2020-11-15  4:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] md/cluster: fix deadlock when doing reshape job Zhao Heming
2020-11-15  4:39   ` heming.zhao [this message]
2020-11-17  3:21   ` Xiao Ni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=864282f2-4924-2cc3-9c9f-4e0ac1888bf5@suse.com \
    --to=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=lidong.zhong@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).