From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D82C64E7A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693AD20705 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KfdV7ZKi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730530AbgLAL3Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 06:29:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45674 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729885AbgLAL3P (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 06:29:15 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43C1C0613CF for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 03:28:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id t12so1054215pjq.5 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:28:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a8b20HHWpsRK7rUuQWB/4pyC37GxhvgUh8QeJraixt0=; b=KfdV7ZKiCuVfQiI5B2QaEQ3QZ6dCMkA3dzuCGfiafcJ7ZraIubPWL+6X0CgLVGp2Lm TVzVaohBiVv9vnMIml86kpAiAsJakTB36X1K6hvF/F9B4ktUjz3DUsdL2ZPw+O7S8gX2 8cdFM3b7yVBUEOE1SEpWq2kfEfrEjneVtz+DeY6w0l1rrpgVE1ihKkr9QjVBaQz+HJAS twtjPttTpCq+Bxy96oz0DbHs2SLnFXBLHP78zSfJVbsqNnUrjnPLnVT0IT1H5SRqnrzG H0wwnPGRNN3MtYT9Ztx3HzJL8ZHNiMMqLVmyN5uHZdv4bNXnH3DMgdmQHvfrvHiMhiaX 2diQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a8b20HHWpsRK7rUuQWB/4pyC37GxhvgUh8QeJraixt0=; b=a3sCO/lD0BGkeYXfxHyD+idAKZCHqrZddgvaw/R1WeOwBUmSC8mi8lEr3FUPxGojQ7 p8KgzNTQ19pUeB/usAkxXDC4iRoyWRFXX/iTJie+gUl2MneXSQZVNhB6gU/QBbN/tMTM 9yn8JLex3jeZ7AmCzLhXjdCTUzUEz7o1LeX/Ahg9FP3iQyLZQkGs9iqKZM3y/MF6p10d I/yvdHSUTFvOAtA9Qb6yG8ctjjf/j2ViV3BaGdXGQ06w6ZaCzx3Ustu8X+G7v0FmJ6eX FFK02Db+UmnUEYeLjvqeDX3vaLwwpMUVGnF0uBEEbRAa3sASbh1G4L5bjb+I1V+1wnno y7pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QD5lGfe1bMKhc+tQHYPxxWHcO0lrlsxLrkluxf/ULWPDBbbV+ 0RcIynufUZDLtFNVmxZ/qKDiB8BOqRGa60+VQlCA0hp7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIKgRdXEHb867e8NZI/bZ5FE3s/tyGwJ6RcjMfIahYNDEgUkmCvt1x1AN+/nKyldiG2swAx4f6aq8aKh6Nj0A= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5d93:: with SMTP id t19mr2187205pji.220.1606822115254; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:28:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Gandalf Corvotempesta Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 12:28:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Fwd: [OT][X-POST] RAID-6 hw rebuild speed To: Discuss Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Il giorno mar 1 dic 2020 alle ore 12:18 Ivan Volosyuk ha scritto: > Resilver time is proportional to the storage used. Do you store the same amount of data on the disks? I'm talking about hardware raid, not ZFS and obviously, on an hw raid, the amount data to transfer is always the same, it doesn't change based on disk form factor (in fact, even with ZFS the amount of data doesn't change based on form factor)