From: Manuel Riel <manu@snapdragon.cc>
To: Vojtech Myslivec <vojtech@xmyslivec.cz>
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
Michal Moravec <michal.moravec@logicworks.cz>,
Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
songliubraving@fb.com, guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com
Subject: Re: Linux RAID with btrfs stuck and consume 100 % CPU
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:14:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBB07C8C-0D83-47DC-9B91-78AD385775E3@snapdragon.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c792470-6ee9-8254-dd57-a7a90ac95bcd@xmyslivec.cz>
I'm also hitting the exact same problem with XFS on RAID6 using a RAID1
write journal on two NVMes. CentOS 8, 4.18.0-240.10.1.el8_3.x86_64.
Symptoms:
- high CPU usage of md4_raid6 process
- IO wait goes up
- IO on that file system locks up for tens of minutes and the kernel reports:
[Wed Feb 10 23:23:05 2021] INFO: task md4_reclaim:1070 blocked for more than 20 seconds.
[Wed Feb 10 23:23:05 2021] Not tainted 4.18.0-240.10.1.el8_3.x86_64 #1
[Wed Feb 10 23:23:05 2021] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[Wed Feb 10 23:23:05 2021] md4_reclaim D 0 1070 2 0x80004000
Already confirmed it's not a timeout mismatch. No drive errors reported. SCT Error Recovery
Control is set to 7 seconds
>> It's kindof a complicated setup. When this problem happens, can you
>> check swap pressure?
There is a RAID1 SWAP partition, but it's almost unused, since the server has ample of RAM.
>>
>> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.stat
>>
>> pgfault and maybe also pgmajfault - see if they're going up; or also
>> you can look at vmstat and see how heavy swap is being used at the
>> time. The thing is.
>>
>> Because any heavy eviction means writes to dm-0->md0 raid1->sdg+sdh
>> SSDs, which are the same SSDs that you have the md1 raid6 mdadm
>> journal going to. So if you have any kind of swap pressure, it very
>> likely will stop the journal or at least substantially slow it down,
>> and now you get blocked tasks as the pressure builds more and more
>> because now you have a ton of dirty writes in Btrfs that can't make it
>> to disk.
I've disabled SWAP to test this theory.
>> If there is minimal swap usage, then this hypothesis is false and
>> something else is going on. I also don't have an explanation why your
>> work around works.
>
> Sadly, I am not able to _disable the journal_ if I do - just by removing
> the device from the array - the MD device instantly fails and btrfs
> volume remounts read-only. I can not find any other way how to disable
> the journal, it seems it is not supported. I can see only
> `--add-journal` option and no corresponding `--delete-journal` one.
>
> I welcome any advice how to exchange write-journal with internal bitmap.
I read that the array needs to be in read-only mode. Then you can fail and replace
the write journal. (not tested)
# mdadm --readonly /dev/md0
# mdadm /dev/md0 --fail /dev/<journal>
# mdadm --manage /dev/md0 --add-journal /dev/<new-journal>
> Any other possible changes that comes to my mind are:
> - Enlarge write-journal
My write journal is about 180 GB
> - Move write-journal to physical sdg/sdh SSDs (out from md0 raid1
> device).
I may try this, but as you say it's risky, especially when using "write-back"
journal mode
> I find the later a bit risky, as the write-journal is not redundant
> then. That's the reason we choose write journal on RAID device.
I'm also experimenting with write-back/write-through mode and different
stripe_cache_size. Hoping to find something. If nothing helps, it may not
be possible/supported to put a write journal on another RAID device?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-11 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-22 20:47 Linux RAID with btrfs stuck and consume 100 % CPU Vojtech Myslivec
2020-07-22 22:00 ` antlists
2020-07-23 2:08 ` Chris Murphy
[not found] ` <29509e08-e373-b352-d696-fcb9f507a545@xmyslivec.cz>
2020-07-28 20:23 ` Chris Murphy
[not found] ` <695936b4-67a2-c862-9cb6-5545b4ab3c42@xmyslivec.cz>
2020-08-14 20:04 ` Chris Murphy
[not found] ` <2f2f1c21-c81b-55aa-6f77-e2d3f32d32cb@xmyslivec.cz>
2020-08-19 22:58 ` Chris Murphy
2020-08-26 15:35 ` Vojtech Myslivec
2020-08-26 18:07 ` Chris Murphy
2020-09-16 9:42 ` Vojtech Myslivec
2020-09-17 17:08 ` Chris Murphy
2020-09-17 17:20 ` Chris Murphy
2020-09-17 17:43 ` Chris Murphy
2020-09-23 18:14 ` Vojtech Myslivec
2021-02-11 3:14 ` Manuel Riel [this message]
2021-02-28 8:34 ` Manuel Riel
[not found] ` <56AD80D0-6853-4E3A-A94C-AD1477D3FDA4@snapdragon.cc>
2021-03-17 15:55 ` Vojtech Myslivec
2020-07-29 21:06 ` Guoqing Jiang
2020-07-29 21:48 ` Chris Murphy
2020-08-12 14:19 ` Vojtech Myslivec
2020-08-12 14:19 ` Vojtech Myslivec
2020-07-30 6:45 ` Song Liu
2020-08-12 13:58 ` Vojtech Myslivec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DBB07C8C-0D83-47DC-9B91-78AD385775E3@snapdragon.cc \
--to=manu@snapdragon.cc \
--cc=guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=michal.moravec@logicworks.cz \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=vojtech@xmyslivec.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).