From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: syzbot+dc3dfba010d7671e05f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH rc] RDMA/cma: Ensure rdma_addr_cancel() happens before issuing more requests
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:34:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0-v1-3bc675b8006d+22-syz_cancel_uaf_jgg@nvidia.com> (raw)
The FSM can run in a circle allowing rdma_resolve_ip() to be called twice
on the same id_priv. While this cannot happen without going through the
work, it violates the invariant that the same address resolution
background request cannot be active twice.
CPU 1 CPU 2
rdma_resolve_addr():
RDMA_CM_IDLE -> RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY
rdma_resolve_ip(addr_handler) #1
process_one_req(): for #1
addr_handler():
RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY -> RDMA_CM_ADDR_BOUND
mutex_unlock(&id_priv->handler_mutex);
[.. handler still running ..]
rdma_resolve_addr():
RDMA_CM_ADDR_BOUND -> RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY
rdma_resolve_ip(addr_handler)
!! two requests are now on the req_list
rdma_destroy_id():
destroy_id_handler_unlock():
_destroy_id():
cma_cancel_operation():
rdma_addr_cancel()
// process_one_req() self removes it
spin_lock_bh(&lock);
cancel_delayed_work(&req->work);
if (!list_empty(&req->list)) == true
! rdma_addr_cancel() returns after process_on_req #1 is done
kfree(id_priv)
process_one_req(): for #2
addr_handler():
mutex_lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex);
!! Use after free on id_priv
rdma_addr_cancel() expects there to be one req on the list and only
cancels the first one. The self-removal behavior of the work only happens
after the handler has returned. This yields a situations where the
req_list can have two reqs for the same "handle" but rdma_addr_cancel()
only cancels the first one.
The second req remains active beyond rdma_destroy_id() and will
use-after-free id_priv once it inevitably triggers.
Fix this by remembering if the id_priv has called rdma_resolve_ip() and
always cancel before calling it again. This ensures the req_list never
gets more than one item in it and doesn't cost anything in the normal flow
that never uses this strange error path.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e51060f08a61 ("IB: IP address based RDMA connection manager")
Reported-by: syzbot+dc3dfba010d7671e05f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
drivers/infiniband/core/cma_priv.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
index c40791baced588..751cf5ea25f296 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
@@ -1776,6 +1776,14 @@ static void cma_cancel_operation(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
{
switch (state) {
case RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY:
+ /*
+ * We can avoid doing the rdma_addr_cancel() based on state,
+ * only RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY has a work that could still execute.
+ * Notice that the addr_handler work could still be exiting
+ * outside this state, however due to the interaction with the
+ * handler_mutex the work is guaranteed not to touch id_priv
+ * during exit.
+ */
rdma_addr_cancel(&id_priv->id.route.addr.dev_addr);
break;
case RDMA_CM_ROUTE_QUERY:
@@ -3413,6 +3421,15 @@ int rdma_resolve_addr(struct rdma_cm_id *id, struct sockaddr *src_addr,
if (dst_addr->sa_family == AF_IB) {
ret = cma_resolve_ib_addr(id_priv);
} else {
+ /* The FSM can return back to RDMA_CM_ADDR_BOUND after
+ * rdma_resolve_ip() is called, eg through the error
+ * path in addr_handler. If this happens the existing
+ * request must be canceled before issuing a new one.
+ */
+ if (id_priv->used_resolve_ip)
+ rdma_addr_cancel(&id->route.addr.dev_addr);
+ else
+ id_priv->used_resolve_ip = 1;
ret = rdma_resolve_ip(cma_src_addr(id_priv), dst_addr,
&id->route.addr.dev_addr,
timeout_ms, addr_handler,
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_priv.h b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_priv.h
index 5c463da9984536..f92f101ea9818f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_priv.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_priv.h
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ struct rdma_id_private {
u8 afonly;
u8 timeout;
u8 min_rnr_timer;
+ u8 used_resolve_ip;
enum ib_gid_type gid_type;
/*
base-commit: ad17bbef3dd573da937816edc0ab84fed6a17fa6
--
2.33.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-16 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-16 18:34 Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH rc] RDMA/cma: Ensure rdma_addr_cancel() happens before issuing more requests Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-22 9:38 ` Haakon Bugge
2021-09-22 14:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-22 14:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-23 5:49 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-23 11:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-23 18:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-23 20:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-23 23:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0-v1-3bc675b8006d+22-syz_cancel_uaf_jgg@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+dc3dfba010d7671e05f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).