archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <>
To: Bob Pearson <>,
	Bart Van Assche <>,
	Zhu Yanjun <>,
	"" <>,
	Bernard Metzler <>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: Apparent regression in blktests since 5.18-rc1+
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 08:56:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

[TLDR: I'm adding this regression report to the list of tracked
regressions; all text from me you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form.]

Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. Top-posting for once,
to make this easily accessible to everyone.

CCing the regression mailing list, as it should be in the loop for all
regressions, as explained here:

To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm
adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot:

#regzbot ^introduced v5.17..v5.18-rc6
#regzbot title rdma: hangs in blktests since 5.18-rc1+
#regzbot ignore-activity

This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also
telling regzbot about it, as explained here:

Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags
pointing to the report (the mail this one replied to), as the kernel's
documentation call for; above page explains why this is important for
tracked regressions.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)

P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.

On 06.05.22 20:11, Bob Pearson wrote:
> Bart,
> Before the most recent kernel update I had blktests running OK on rdma_rxe. Since we went on to 5.18.0-rc1+
> I have been experiencing hangs. All of this is with the 'revert scsi-debug' patch which addressed the
> 3 min timeout related to modprobe -r scsi-debug.
> You suggested checking with siw and I finally got around to this and the behavior is exactly the same.
> Specifically here is a run and dmesgs from that run:
> root@u-22:/home/bob/src/blktests# use_siw=1 ./check srp
> srp/001 (Create and remove LUNs)                             [passed]
>     runtime  3.388s  ...  3.501s
> srp/002 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login (mq))
>     runtime  54.689s  ...
> I had to reboot to recover.
> The dmesg output is attached in a long file called out.
> The output looks normal until line 1875 where it hangs at an "Already connected ..." message.
> This is the same as the other hangs I have been seeing.
> This is followed by a splat warning that a cpu has hung for 120 seconds.
> Since this is behaving the same for rxe and siw I am going to stop chasing this bug since
> it is most likely outside of the the rxe driver.
> Bob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-09  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06 18:11 Bob Pearson
2022-05-07  0:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-07  0:29   ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-05-07  1:29     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-07  1:55       ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-05-07 13:43         ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-08  4:13           ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-10 15:24             ` Pearson, Robert B
2022-05-12 21:57             ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-12 22:25               ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-13  0:41                 ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-13  3:40                   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-17 15:21                     ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-17 20:44                       ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-17 20:54                         ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-17 20:59                         ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-08  8:43         ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-05-09  8:01       ` Zhu Yanjun
2022-05-09 11:52         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-09 12:31           ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-05-09 12:33             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-09 12:42               ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-05-07 13:40     ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-09  6:56 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2022-05-10  3:53   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: Apparent regression in blktests since 5.18-rc1+' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).