On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 08:25 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 12/2/19 6:03 PM, Steve Wise wrote: > > If RoCE PDUs being sent or received contain pad bytes, then the iCRC > > is miscalculated resulting PDUs being emitted by RXE with an > > incorrect > > iCRC, as well as ingress PDUs being dropped due to erroneously > > detecting > > a bad iCRC in the PDU. The fix is to include the pad bytes, if any, > > in iCRC computations. > > Should this description mention that this patch breaks compatibility > with SoftRoCE drivers that do not include this fix? Do we need a > kernel > module parameter that allows to select either the old or the new > behavior? No. The original soft-RoCE driver was supposed to be compatible with hardware devices. Because of this bug, it obviously wasn't. This is a bug fix, and we do not need to do anything to be compatible with the broken behavior. Instead, it just needs noting that the soft-RoCE implementation in prior kernels has a known wire format bug that impacts communications with both fixed versions of the driver and real hardware devices. > > CC: bvanassche@acm.org,3100102071@zju.edu.cn,leon@kernel.org > > Should this Cc-line perhaps be converted into three Cc-lines? > > Otherwise this patch looks fine to me. > > Thanks, > > Bart. > -- Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD