From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: rdma-core: Location of 70-persistent-ipoib.rules Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:45:26 -0400 Message-ID: <1506098726.5172.2.camel@redhat.com> References: <1505129627.3732.3.camel@profitbricks.com> <20170911162521.GD32117@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170911162521.GD32117-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe , Benjamin Drung Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 10:25 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 01:33:47PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > Since 70-persistent-ipoib.rules is just a commented example, should > > we > > better put it into /usr/share/doc/rdma-core instead (where udev.md > > is > > placed)? > > That would be fine for me, but I think /etc/ is appropriate in this > case and the lintian rule is just overzealous. I agree with Jason on this. I think lintian should possibly be fixed instead ;-) -- Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html