From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED02C32757 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD16217D7 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732760AbfHHO6W (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:58:22 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:50866 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732667AbfHHO6V (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:58:21 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 78EEF39878E15D84ACF2; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 22:58:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from linux-ioko.site (10.71.200.31) by DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 22:58:08 +0800 From: Lijun Ou To: , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH V4 for-next 13/14] RDMA/hns: Disable alw_lcl_lpbk of SSU Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 22:53:53 +0800 Message-ID: <1565276034-97329-14-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1565276034-97329-1-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> References: <1565276034-97329-1-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.71.200.31] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org From: Weihang Li If we enabled alw_lcl_lpbk in promiscuous mode, packet whose source and destination mac address is equal will be handled in both inner loopback and outer loopback. This will halve performance of roce in promiscuous mode. Signed-off-by: Weihang Li --- drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c index b949329..567be0a 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static int hns_roce_set_vf_switch_param(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, cpu_to_le16(HNS_ROCE_CMD_FLAG_NO_INTR | HNS_ROCE_CMD_FLAG_IN); desc.flag &= cpu_to_le16(~HNS_ROCE_CMD_FLAG_WR); roce_set_bit(swt->cfg, VF_SWITCH_DATA_CFG_ALW_LPBK_S, 1); - roce_set_bit(swt->cfg, VF_SWITCH_DATA_CFG_ALW_LCL_LPBK_S, 1); + roce_set_bit(swt->cfg, VF_SWITCH_DATA_CFG_ALW_LCL_LPBK_S, 0); roce_set_bit(swt->cfg, VF_SWITCH_DATA_CFG_ALW_DST_OVRD_S, 1); return hns_roce_cmq_send(hr_dev, &desc, 1); -- 1.9.1