From: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
To: <dledford@redhat.com>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: <leon@kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH for-next 1/3] RDMA/hns: Remove some redundant variables related to capabilities
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 18:32:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1578738761-3176-2-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1578738761-3176-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>
In struct hns_roce_caps, max_srq_sg and max_srqwqes is unused, and
max_srqs has the same effect with num_srqs. So remove them from this
structrue.
Signed-off-by: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 3 ---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 3 ---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
index 8d2bcd8..7459ebb 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
@@ -800,10 +800,8 @@ struct hns_roce_caps {
int reserved_qps;
int num_qpc_timer;
int num_cqc_timer;
- u32 max_srq_sg;
int num_srqs;
u32 max_wqes;
- u32 max_srqs;
u32 max_srq_wrs;
u32 max_srq_sges;
u32 max_sq_desc_sz;
@@ -817,7 +815,6 @@ struct hns_roce_caps {
u32 min_wqes;
int reserved_cqs;
int reserved_srqs;
- u32 max_srqwqes;
int num_aeq_vectors;
int num_comp_vectors;
int num_other_vectors;
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
index f1e0ba6..3b13290 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
@@ -1668,12 +1668,10 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_profile(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
caps->num_srqs = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SRQ_NUM;
caps->min_cqes = HNS_ROCE_MIN_CQE_NUM;
caps->max_cqes = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_CQE_NUM;
- caps->max_srqwqes = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SRQWQE_NUM;
caps->max_sq_sg = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_SGE_NUM;
caps->max_extend_sg = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_EXTEND_SGE_NUM;
caps->max_rq_sg = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_RQ_SGE_NUM;
caps->max_sq_inline = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_INLINE;
- caps->max_srq_sg = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SRQ_SGE_NUM;
caps->num_uars = HNS_ROCE_V2_UAR_NUM;
caps->phy_num_uars = HNS_ROCE_V2_PHY_UAR_NUM;
caps->num_aeq_vectors = HNS_ROCE_V2_AEQE_VEC_NUM;
@@ -1761,7 +1759,6 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_profile(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
caps->local_ca_ack_delay = 0;
caps->max_mtu = IB_MTU_4096;
- caps->max_srqs = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SRQ;
caps->max_srq_wrs = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SRQ_WR;
caps->max_srq_sges = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SRQ_SGE;
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
index 6e589f2..d0031d5 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int hns_roce_query_device(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
props->max_pkeys = 1;
props->local_ca_ack_delay = hr_dev->caps.local_ca_ack_delay;
if (hr_dev->caps.flags & HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_SRQ) {
- props->max_srq = hr_dev->caps.max_srqs;
+ props->max_srq = hr_dev->caps.num_srqs;
props->max_srq_wr = hr_dev->caps.max_srq_wrs;
props->max_srq_sge = hr_dev->caps.max_srq_sges;
}
--
2.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-11 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-11 10:32 [PATCH for-next 0/3] RDMA/hns: Get pf capabilities from firmware Weihang Li
2020-01-11 10:32 ` Weihang Li [this message]
2020-01-11 10:32 ` [PATCH for-next 2/3] RDMA/hns: Add interfaces to get " Weihang Li
2020-01-11 10:32 ` [PATCH for-next 3/3] RDMA/hns: Get " Weihang Li
2020-01-15 18:38 ` [PATCH for-next 0/3] " Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1578738761-3176-2-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com \
--to=liweihang@huawei.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).