From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE947C433DF for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9B42078D for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="JPslpKxr" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726292AbgHMOmW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:42:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44390 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726106AbgHMOmW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:42:22 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 060CEC061757 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:42:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id k12so4978137otr.1 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:42:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K2htmOq7NFpdcD9aOKZJ3Y8V8xZ4YM39J7Yabr7PWJg=; b=JPslpKxrwAfe4//Moijfs68WYAHKwqsJERU2OJp46xiyckOj34x/NevdY3sX/moWUC idgcPx6oaAc7LAAaTtnUtH6BYQZaPXntd0zIwjlm+JdiMCTw2s555yTM2S9BQjcmb8xi l2Muzi0ib6KDeDyKiKF4c6HpicvLa13lVRizdo6MdZdZScyWYy9soTJRC9Il234dVBg+ 2X8BWSGmGndYvgDJ1aUHqS0+BMi/yIbj6cu9+dfnj2htcvA3TA+eufo38xKV25tY6+ze UQ/bfwhMT275oEP5Dr5bqqRZhYBsGE+YTShdg5gYl/jEOaQ3f5OoOHmn7ESSZDRu3ke+ BP1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K2htmOq7NFpdcD9aOKZJ3Y8V8xZ4YM39J7Yabr7PWJg=; b=Bh3E9uElGeojd6Ij45LemqF5UY0igi1nVmLURep7Ed7JY7rQ6EF7b5ZXcERJruOjLC YY/wDaanYd6bOtsA8YKyUhpEzohvuac0nunrIhA72CW7feXqQaY4VKgvwy3ZdbyvYUB/ /SI+9npdmFPFH+ZQUf4bGaHbNKtR2BlpvJXly3rcDfnPkQuc1heQ7lAZYdXk404kBMCT clzy8NbZm8oyuMdtis/c9h2eT9qikPTSbBTIizxpk+jSZCnuHXHtr3jdqBrzDam08apO e1zXIvWe2i989UsPoUaLdOEH/DOCtoW0NygzIb4Yd0zkukp5kMV+18DwimKXCWytmuqG 2d8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531v92ihLptuadCe0UX1kJXFb3hiu7m6XTlv7kyaYYnhis9dstHP DykyCyzC0ZDalQGhmyy+LfN2OfPmPHg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXk9bJKrUrYzF9akEG/BxfDJfkd6DpEYbS7G882WDXoDdp/C1sYgViggS64kFhoWcfrMTIfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6d03:: with SMTP id o3mr4472508otp.82.1597329739257; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2605:6000:8b03:f000:d46:5113:64d8:597c? ([2605:6000:8b03:f000:d46:5113:64d8:597c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm1142425otp.15.2020.08.13.07.42.18 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:42:18 -0700 (PDT) To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org From: Bob Pearson Subject: work completion errors Message-ID: <15a34af9-62af-9367-cd0f-1e5f9da1260b@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:42:18 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org In IBA Vol 1 Release 1.4 in Table 101 it mentions a Memory Management Operation error type. There doesn't seem to be a good match to that in the current list of WC completions. Is there a plan to add something like this? I am looking for the correct status to return for a memory invalidate operation that fails. The best options at the moment look like QP operation error or memory fault but neither is really correct.