From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leon Romanovsky Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:53:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20161120125333.GC4946@leon.nu> References: <58466423-c87e-3921-101e-bffab8989fd8@redhat.com> <20161117184950.GP4240@leon.nu> <582E089A.3040106@redhat.com> <20161117200203.GQ4240@leon.nu> <710f3e81-dd9c-8221-cf5e-7a96f4cad5b9@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <710f3e81-dd9c-8221-cf5e-7a96f4cad5b9-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Doug Ledford Cc: Or Gerlitz , linux-rdma , Linux Kernel List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org --9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 06:11:22PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 11/19/2016 2:46 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: > >> On 11/17/2016 5:24 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > > > [...] > > Are you going to comment on that to the submitter? if not, they are > > going to continue with this practice. > > Comment on what to the submitter? That the patch might not have been > -rc material? I would have been OK with it around rc1 or rc2, just not > this late in the rc cycle. In the end, I don't, nor can I, rely on > submitters to determine what's RC material and what isn't, that's what > I'm supposed to be doing. I will always apply my own judgment on that > issue and submitters will learn over time when their patches get skipped > on any sort of a regular basis. And I'm pretty fine with Doug's judgement regarding -rc vs. -next. Our submission flow meets the expected by RDMA maintainer and we will continue to work in the same mode as long it suits Doug's expectations for acceptable/unacceptable submission. > > > How are we supposed to realize from patchworks + your github branches > > that patches that were submitted for 4.9-rc are picked for 4.10? this > > is very confusing and error prone too. > > I emailed the submitters off list about it and provided them a list of > what patches went where and why. Thank you, I compared the submitted list with found in your trees and everything looks in place. --9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYMZzNAAoJEORje4g2clinjxQP/iCptAkX7YdqZgtC4tIgLjMZ +6YrX962SMbnKNFYH5oGVNaylDoUiUJtIKwG6aUYP50OxEY43/hJLSZotcvLcqq8 wHT6XzLL/Uhlemlxbvtg280egQth0WLDfITgfc2B1s+hgb5lrPXQhRM1XPy//qYz H69Yfo0oJjUvOTowSPEYHVyJayOm/gRvu1fDfIikw9Y56i2Y/7olXNI9KvT2srhw pKyb0bqkIFG4aONTdsBiCNGuLIzK4Ghd2Kn+RI90hYkFg+Xql3syQNUO+6ff605H Fai2HeMpA6FmMWyBAXbKbGoq04ipSdigFtoDwJr5/RbmPquImXRNuZinUQ2maCBH Wq9NswOuh8+nA0lUZg59odJ/UmIvE6RBcORF9LmELNQka+L4mrdLJUa9r6BBqaOk 0xy0zyNcPC3T9kPmDyj1sjV7iHcFEBSgvulj/swCVhbdwZm12vHkBtaUw6jK1FGC ikruBD14KBxqE1fS/MDPhe4L3Qzs0d6+O4o76X40P0R1nson7VnwEaJztkeMVHp6 QMeEux9INIbDTHl4NBs8gIGa8haCZonBtloW3gXThJNCJjXNhomg0DoZ/XHyYOnU W7wQV8umhqJhLYujx51RNXTO076mjwyGDJGVfDZIp8Ei2t9D98Ce/S/O3Dlxfzp7 EBtL0HO9SP/XkWH+uOUy =IOz4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9Ek0hoCL9XbhcSqy-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html